Wattgate 381 v. Hubbell 8300 cryogenically treated
Wattgate 381 v. Hubbell 8300 cryogenically treated
The Wattgate 381 (non-cryogenically treated) and the Hubbell 8300 (cryogenically treated) sounded SIGNIFICANTLY better than the standard (non-cryogenically) treated FIM 880 and Hubbell 8300 outlets.
I could not distinguish the difference between the Wattgate 381 (non-cryogenically treated, $148) and the Hubbell 8300 outlet (cryogenically treated $60). They both added GREAT synergy to my system.
All 12 of the well-recorded CDs I listened to (that I use for demo comparison purposes) sounded as if the volume had been turned up one or two clicks at the preamp, resulting in a much more lifelike performance. There was more detail in the lows, mids and highs, and I heard a sweeter timbre and background accompaniment I had never heard before. The sound was not harsh, and the bass was bigger and deeper. I suspect there had been a lowering of the noise floor (blacker background) which improved my ability to hear the performance in greater detail. I can’t explain it but the Wattgate 381 and/or the Hubbell 8300 outlet cryogenically treated (done correctly, 24-48 hours @ -324) IMO will be an improvement over the same outlet/or other outlets that are not cryogenically treated.
Next I want to have my standard Hubbell 8300’s, Wattgate 381, and FIM 880 cryogenically treated. One note, the Hubbell 8300 (cryogenically treated) took three days to break in and sound pleasing.
Associated equipment:
First Sound Presence Audio Linestage I Wadia Transport #20 Dodson Audio Model DA-217 MK II D Cary 2A3 Monoblocks that sit upon SP 004 Sistrum Platforms including three direct coupled Audio Points Equi=Tech 2Q Power Balancer Soliloquy SM-2A3 Speakers and the Soliloquy speaker stands filled with Sistrum Micro-Bearing steel fill Bybee Quantum speaker filters Pure Note Epsilon Reference Speaker Cables Pure Note Epsilon Reference Interconnects Purist Proteus Digital Cable Purist Proteus 20 Amp Power Cord BMI Whale Elite MK I Power Cord BMI Whale Elite MK II Power Cords BMI Shark Power Cord Shunyata, Black Mamba Audio Points under all componenty Salamander Archetype 5.0 with Mega-spikes Dedicated 20 Amp circuits with FIM #880 outlets/ Wattgate 381/ Hubbell 8300 cryo
Sorry to hijack herein,but there is great disparity on things croyed.I am now buying speaker cable. As I have communicated with many wire makers--"everybody" I have talked to dislikes the concept.--Yes everybody! Ok, I'm also thinking they have no actual experience with/ or they just don't do it(don'thave local access) (whatever). The only mfgs I know of, that are big supporters are Jenna Labs and Vertual Dynamics. My mind isn't closed. 10 years ago I'm sure there were just as many folk skeptical re. power cords.
I hear you Zaikesman. I myself had my share of doubts on the cryo issue until I installed a set of cryo treated output tubes in my amp. Now there is a possibility that the tubes themselves were better than the stock tubes I was using and the cryo treatment really didn't add or subtract anything. I don't know for sure but I can tell you that the "improvement", attributed to the combination of better tubes and cryo treatment until proven otherwise, was quite dramatic.
Larry, how about cryo treated 381's? Where will this madness end! Thanks for the update and no I haven't yet decided on where to go from here.
I agree Tubegroover - you would really have to remove one set of tubes, have them treated, and reinsert them to evaluate. Even then, the time delay would allow for uncertainty. But with two completely different sets of tubes, you have no way of knowing where to attribute what. (Glad they sound good, though!) Thanks Lak for the website, I will check it out.
If i recall correctly, there was a member here who posted a "shoot-out" that they did with three identical sets of cables. They used a "stock" set of cables that had been used normally, another set of cables that were "burned" on some type of a "cable cooker" and another set that was cryo'd. Memory says that the member thought that both the "cooked" and "cryo'd" cables sounded nearly identical and were miles ahead of the stock cables. To me, this seems like a pretty valid way to conduct such a test. I don't know the specifics, but i'm sure that the person that had spent the money to do such a test wanted to find out the truth and do it in a manner that was as free of bias as is possible. Sean >
You must have a verified phone number and physical address in order to post in the Audiogon Forums. Please return to Audiogon.com and complete this step. If you have any questions please contact Support.