I always prefer phono stage featured user select-able loading option, so the user can choose their preference.
Cartridge Loading for a phono pre amp
Hello,
I have recently acquired a phono pre amp recommended by Michael Fremer. It is “THE VINYL”, from QHW audio, Spain. It got a great review. I have a Benz Micro Glider rated at 1.1MV. I have no idea how to set the dip switches for MC Load impedance for this cartridge. The options I have are as follows: 47K, 1K, 560R, 470R, 100R, and 47R. I have a solid state amp and pre-amp, and also have a sub that I use, rarely.
Any advice would be most appreciated!!
- ...
- 137 posts total
@holmz : As @imhififan I did my tests in specific for resonance and tracking against load changes. Btw, thank's for your answer .
Differences in sound with load changes depends of the active high gain phono stage characteristics and your brain perception about. LOMC cartridges are " non " sensitive to load impedance changes. R. |
Dear @imhififan : " Although theoretically loading..... and 100Ω loading made the cartridge work 470 times harder than 47kΩ loading. ..............., I think the effect on the cantilever stiffness is insignificant. Therefore the test result show no difference. "
Rigth and was proved in other thread:
" certainly not on tracking which is demonstrably false based on IM tests on tracking performance that I have incidentally performed as a function of load. While mechanical impact does occur as a result of electrical load- there is some back emf necessarily generated by the signal current that affects the mechanical motion, but a quick back of the envelope calculation using Lenz’s law and the 10uH cartridge suggests a 2 orders of magnitude difference between the generated signal and the back EMF for a 100 ohm load at 20kHz- certainly not enough to cause tracking issues . By the way, I constructed a model for the cartridge back EMF using Lenz’s law and incorporated it into my simulations.
R. |
- 137 posts total