Thiel Owners


Guys-

I just scored a sweet pair of CS 2.4SE loudspeakers. Anyone else currently or previously owned this model?
Owners of the CS 2.4 or CS 2.7 are free to chime in as well. Thiel are excellent w/ both tubed or solid-state gear!

Keep me posted & Happy Listening!
128x128jafant

It's not that Jim didn't know about CDs dynamic peaks, it's more like he was trying to cope to keep the equalized bass viable. That woofer was the first driver with his magnetic shorting rings for a more stable magnetic field and it had a huge overhung coil to handle the required excursion. The overhung motor requirement was the largest cause of the end of eq. He figured out the drastic distortion of reduction of underhung motors and powering long gaps was virtually impossible because rare-earth magnets weren't yet in the mix. Long excursions and underhung motors contradict each other.

Phase angle was not a thing in reviews at that time. In fact Jim goaded JA / Stereophile into measuring phase at all. JA and Larry A came to our factory in 1988 to spend a day in Jim's lab learning why he thought it mattered, how he measured it and so forth - and they gradually entered the arena of phase and time.

A promising solution to the dynamic limit would be to match a powered subwoofer with probably a second order crossover at 80Hz to limit the woofer excursion while getting true integrated bass to 20Hz.

As has been discussed here many moons ago, I think that crossing over at the 40 Hz setting would be more advantageous.

As has been discussed here many moons ago, I think that crossing a subwoofer over at the 40 Hz setting would be more advantageous.

Yes, of course. That circuitry is already extant in the eq. There is only 6dB of boost at 40Hz vs 12dB @ 20Hz. Tomorrow I'll run today's trials at 40Hz vs straight wire.