How Electricity Actually Works


In November of last year I posted a Vertasium YT vid titled "The Big Misconception About Electricity".  Well it caused quite a stir and like an arachnid had many legs many of which attempted to draw A'gonrs into the poison fangs!

Well, here is the follow-up to that original vid which caused quite a stir in the "intellectual" community as well.

Vertasium "How Electricity Actually Works".

 

This does have implications for our audio cabling...

Regards,

barts 

128x128barts

@carlsbad ,

BTW, I do know bernoulli’s equation. It is what makes a plane fly, it isn’t a magic equation that causes a sail to push the winds.

No luck needed. I have taught physics. At the university level. Technically I was just the TA, but I essentially taught a few courses.

Perhaps you need to read less and criticize more?

In the faster than wind car (in the direction of wind), the rotating propeller provides the speed differential between the car and the wind hence generating thrust beyond the speed of the wind.

And here, before you teach your next class, the physics of sailing.

https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.2883908

p.s. I will take that apology at any time.

@deludedaudiophile I suggest you step away from the keyboard and go sleep off whatever you're drinking.  You're embarassing yourself.  Like how you messed up your attempted slam of me.

I hadn't seen the physics today article but want to compliment them in saying exactly what I posted above.  perhaps you didn't read what I wrote, or perhaps you don't understand the vector math explanation that i gave.  

But I'll be honest now. Give up on physics and find another job.  You need money to buy audio equipment.

Jerry

 

The Vector math explanation YOU gave is wrong. They definitely did not say what you said. The vector has effect, but that is it. It does not define the speed. It is akin to angle of attack. However, the primary force is Bernoulli effect. To that end, the shape of the sail has a large effect as it forms the wing. Trade-off losses versus lift for maximum speed for given hull drag at a given speed. Having a hard time believing you are a physicist since you don’t seem to have understood the article and certainly not to any level of nuance.

Anyone who reads that article, even laypeople, will see that you are wrong.

https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.2883908

 

Moving air has kinetic energy that can, through its interaction with the sails, be used to propel a sailboat. Like airplane wings, sails exploit Bernoulli’s principle. An airplane wing is designed to cause the air moving over its top to move faster than the air moving along its undersurface. That results in lower pressure above the wing than below it. The pressure difference generates the lift provided by the wing.

 

The wind is doing two things,” said Margot Gerritsen, an engineering professor at Stanford. “It’s pushing, but there’s also a part of this wind that is dragging. That dragging is done with this force called lift."

“Lift,” in the case of a sailboat, doesn’t mean “up” although it does in the case of an airplane. In fact, the physics that allow an airplane to fly are the same physics that allow a sailboat to travel faster than the wind. The difference is that airplanes lift up off the ground, and sailboats lift parallel to the ground— as if they’re flying sideways.

 

 

deludedaudiophile "The Vector math explanation YOU gave is wrong. They definitely did not say what you said. The vector has effect, but that is it. It does not define the speed. It is akin to angle of attack. However, the primary force is Bernoulli effect.

This is false and in error and reflects a misunderstanding of the physics involved perhaps the cause of which is you’re overestimation of the knowledge you claim to have attained from pursuing you’re advanced degrees and experience in battery sales.

 

You will need to go back and work the math while consulting more advanced physics reference materials and perhaps the assistance of an experienced physicist.

@clearthink ,

I have a PhD (yes really -  feel free to test me) in solid-state physics, have worked extensively in semiconductor processing. I am now a technical director for one of the largest battery companies on the planet.

Feel free to share your qualifications that you feel are so extensive that you believe your insults were warranted.

I have refrained from stating my full qualifications as for the most part, they are not relevant. I also have never felt the need to ask anyone else their qualifications here. I based my opinions on the quality of their posts.

I suggest dialing back the insults and dialing up dealing with what has been posted in the thread. Everyone will benefit.