I'm fine with the listening experience. But when you are in it as a business having repeatable proof that your wares do what you say is a bit different!
Good to see someone here with a sense of business ethics.
GaN amps: Peachtree or LSA Voyager?
Peachtree 400 and LSA Voyager GaN amps: Does anyone have direct experience with both of these amps? Can you comment on any differences that might exist in sound? I know the internals are supposed to be the same but even if that is true implementation can make a difference. Both are highly regarded by those who own them.
Might also be helpful if you listed the rest of your system (Pre and speakers).
My current system is: Bricasti M3 DAC; Rogue RP-7 (NOS) pre; Bel Canto Ref600M amps; Fyne F1-8 speakers.
Thanks in advance!
Where have I advocated for technical perfection? Where have I said that some people can't like whatever they want? |
This appears to advocate objective excellence as the only path while eschewing any validity to subjective opinions. Perhaps in the framework of this discussion that is a valid argument, however, when considering components with larger (measurably significant differences), it would be absolutely necessary to debate or at least discuss subjective opinions as that would be necessary to correlate objective changes to subjective impressions.
|
Current products by Purifi and Orchard are beyond the limits of human hearing as far as distortion is concerned. The limiting device in the playback chain is not the amp, it's the speakers and the room. I would advise looking into Purifi and Orchard with state of the art tech and performance and then turn my attention to other links in the play back chain.
|