Cartridge Loading.....Part II


I read last night the below noted discussion with great interest.  It's a long post but worth the effort and I found it interesting.

It started me thinking about the amount of loading on my moving coil cartridges.  Years ago I purchased my first MC Cart, a very nice Benz Micro Glider, medium output of 0.5 mV as I recall.  At that time I inquired about loading here on Audiogon.  I was convinced, via discussion, by another member, that 300 Ohms was the magic number, so I thought.

Time moved onward and my second MC Cart is currently a Lyra Delos, again medium output 0.6mV.  Both carts had Boron cantilevers', 6 nines oxygen free copper coils and line contact diamond stylis.  When I set up the Delos I did not change or even consider 'loading' changes.  That was a grand mistake.....

Well, thanks to this specific thread I started to second guess myself . (you can do this when retired and more time is on your hands....)

My take from this recent thread is as follows.  Load at 100 Ohms or at 47K Ohms with a quality MC cartridge.  I opened up my Conrad Johnson EF1 Phono Stage this afternoon.  Found it set at 500 Ohms loading.  100 Ohms is not an available setting.  Damn...All these years I've been running the wrong loading, and on two carts, back to back...  I don't recall why I set the loading at 500 Ohms.  Faulty logic.

I reset the loading to 47K, buttoned things up and called the wife in for a listening session.  Sure as heck both of us noticed the highs were crisper and more 'apparent' than in the recent past.  Not a huge difference, but yes, a difference..  Hard lesson learned!

So, you smarter folks on this site might banter amongst yourselves, but in reality there are those of us, behind the curtains, reading and listening!  I just wish I hadn't wasted all those years listening to the incorrect load setting!

Ending with a sincere thank you very much!!

Lou

 

quincy

I have been complaining about that on this forum over and over again.  Only be direct questioning can one find out what the input impedance of these "current driven" phono stages actually is, and it's typically from a few ohms in the best case to as high as 20 ohms. 

@lewm I don't know how you could specify the input impedance; it varies with the impedance of the cartridge! Again, the gain of the circuit is defined by the ratio of the feedback resistor vs the input resistor (which is literally the cartridge itself). So if the cartridge is 30 Ohms and the feedback resistor is 300 Ohms, the gain of the circuit would be 10 or 10dB. If the cartridge were only 15 Ohms that would mean the gain of the circuit is 20 (16dB). So the input impedance can only be defined by the fact that a virtual ground is present. But you have another problem, which is that with almost any opamp made you run out of Gain Bandwidth Product over about 20dB of gain or thereabouts.

This means that with cartridges that have a very low impedance the circuit may lose neutrality. Personally I would prefer to have the gain be a set thing so that the cartridge would not be able to affect the phono section in that manner.

I haven't kept track of which current driven phono stages on the market use op amps or discrete transistors or tubes in the input I/V stage, although I don't know of any that use a tube or how you could use a tube in that fashion.  However, I would guess that many do use a discrete transistor and so by your definition cannot be current amplifiers.  If they all use op amps, then I stand corrected, and right there I have learned something about them.  However, every one that I have investigated was said to have some finite input Z, greater than zero and notwithstanding the cartridge with which it might be matched. (Especially because most of the advertising suggests you can match them with any cartridge having a "low" internal resistance, low being better than higher.)  But I do get that to be a pure current amplifier, the input impedance ought to be zero. Sticking my neck out in saying this, but I would rather gain understanding than worry about negative feedback, no pun intended.

OK... lets try a different tact since i do not think ground (be it virtual or real) matters in this situation.  I am simply relying on Ohm and Kirchoff for this ideal case.

Take a 30Ω cartridge and hook it up to an ideal voltage amp and then another one and hook it up to an ideal current amp.  Now take two AC microamp clamps and monitor the current output of each cartridge.  Will the currents be the same for each cartridge?

dave

Ralph, I just had a “duh” moment. Sutherland describes the input of his Loco and Little Loco as a “virtual” short circuit. I had heretofore interpreted that word in its more literary sense; virtual meaning “nearly “or “close to”. Thanks to your input, I now see he means it electronically (virtual). I also see that nearly all current drive phono stages do use an op amp input. The BMC MCCI being an exception. It connects the cartridge output to an the emitters of array of discrete transistors.

Too late to edit my post, but I meant to say, "It connects the cartridge to the emitters of an array of discrete transistors."  Not "It connects the cartridge output to an the emitters of array of discrete transistors."

Sounds like driving a triode via its cathode, but I won't dare go there.