I’m sure the circuit can keep up with any musical dynamics, you may have an argument on if it sounds better than straight up class A because of the added circuitry, but there is no way to compare it unless someone comes up with an amp with a switch from this to straight up class A.
Krell anticipator circuits of the 1990s
"Krell FPB-600 Stereo Power Amplifier
This big power amp features the evolution of the plateau biasing circuit introduced in the KSA series of amps. This circuit anticipates the power demands of the output by monitoring the incoming signal as the demand for power increases, the more power the amplifier supplies. After a grace period of fifteen seconds and no additional high current signal demands, the Krell FPB-600 amplifier returns to its appropriate power setting. This feature allows for Class A bias output without all the wasted electricity and heat."
Do you believe the anticipator can up the bias quickly enough? A guy hits a huge bass drum, the anticipator circuit senses this and ups the bias in time for the hit to be amplified in Class A?
We are talking a micro second. Once he hit it the start of the moment was over. This was a con. Created by Krell because they were under pressure from the emerging green lobby to cut power consumption. Qualified Krell service engineers have not been able to explain to me how it can work.
Me? I still have my KRS200s. Pure Class A. So there's my answer.
- ...
- 63 posts total
@invalid What makes you sure the circuit is fast enough? What evidence do you have? I know of no evidence that has been published? Of course it can be compared in the same way any alternative components are compared. Listen to one, then the other. |
@invalid You used the term 'sounds better'. We are comparing different amplifiers all the time and expressing opinions as to which sounds better (to the listener). None of these has the same circuit design, yet we express opinions, sometimes vehemently. By the way, what makes you sure the circuit is fast enough?? |
Where’d this “anticipator circuit” come from? As I see it, Krell has been attempting to improve their amplifiers by innovation which includes removing/addressing issues with class A amplification while maintaining the benefits. Heat, and efficiency being the problems with fully class A. I doubt Krell is just tossing about ad claims to sell product. They are not a mass market company looking to move amps and ramp up production. I do not, I am no engineer, think the OP bass drum analogy accurately describes what Krell is doing here. It is a sort of straw man. The process is patented. It can be proven on the bench and to the ears. It either delivers its goal or it does not. It is not as some seem to think, a secret circuit that can tell the future. In the end does it deliver on its promise? |
- 63 posts total