Totem Arro vs Revel Concerta F12

A couple of points,

I'm right behind you, as I have rearrange my listening space for more room for speakers. I'll wait a bit, as the new Revel line is coming out now, so it may be worth waiting to see how the F206 shapes up.

I would keep a contingency fund for a sub if you want deep bass. The F12's might meet your needs without though.

F12's come up used on a regular basis, and I suspect the dealer demos will show up soon.

P.S. Totem Bass is fast and quick; just not enough. I blew two woofers before I got the sub.

If you like the sound of the Arro, you might also consider another model of Totem speakers. I auditioned the Arro last year, along with the Sttaf and Rainmaker. Each of the speakers sounded quite different but the Rainmaker had the best overall balance of virtues, IMO, including more weight in the lower range than the Arro and more detail and life than the Sttaf. BTW, later when I added a LossLess DFPC original power cord to the system, the Rainmakers sounded much more dynamic... even at lower volumes. Compact and easy to drive, too.

I think the Revels are better than The Arros, but if you have the dough the new revels will probably kill the f12s, and from what I have been reading about them, probably kill a lot of speakers much more expensive.

What do you think the price new revels?

they are offering two towers, the smaller one is 3,000 retail, the larger one is 5,000 a pair.