Oh, you mean a Crown XLi 2500 isn't "audiophile" grade then at $595. Guess not.
Seriously, over the years as far as this hobby is concerned, I've been perplexed by this "push" to Class D. What exactly does it offer at the end of the day that A or AB or H don't have?
I mean sure, it is nice to pickup a 750W amp with one hand and all, but does anyone really CARE that their Class A or AB amp is using a bit more power than a Class D would? If you can afford $4000 to $40,000 for an amp, I don't think you are worrying about your power bill.
I guess I'm asking, just because a technology is possible doesn't give enough reason as to why to pursue it, so what gives?
Class D Amplification Announcement
After 60 some odd years of disappointment, Class D has finally arrived. As per The Absolute Sound’s Jonathan Valin, the Borrenson-designed Aavik P-580 amp “is the first Class D amplifier I can recommend without the usual reservations. …the P-580 does not have the usual digital-like upper-mid/lower-treble glare or brick wall-like top-octave cut-off that Class D amps of the past have evinced.”
Past designers of Class D and audiophiles, rejoice; Michael Borrenson has finally realized the potential of Class D.
- ...
- 172 posts total
No!
I agree! My class A monoblock amps, have a power consumption of 65 watts. 😎 Mike |
I have not heard the Merril or Atma-Sphere GaN amps. I can only speak directly about all the tube and solid state amp I have owned. And to a lessor degree, amps that I have heard at shows and friend’s homes. The review by @jjss49, I feel, gives an accurate breakdown of AGD’s performance. IME, the AGD Audions produce SQ that is different and unique. Partially, AGD’s designer clearly has a great ear. And partly, he has created an amp that reproduces all the “broad strokes” and, especially, the subtitles that take SQ from great to “real”. One key of these is hearing the phrasing of musicians. Something that is both subtitle and profound. I have only heard this quality with AGD. |
not sure how to answer... i would say that most low powered sweetie-pie tube amps provide a level of 2nd order harmonics that give voices and instruments a certain glow and lusciousness... i do not feel that the agd’s really do that nearly as much, its midrange is more neutral (if well detailed, very dimensional and ’human’ to my ear) but i don’t think anyone would mistake the agd female vocal reproduction to sound like that of a 300b 10 watt single ended amp .... then again, the agd’s speed, control and its own sense of very high purity in driving a much much wider range of normal and even hard to drive speakers needs to be factored in imaging wise, i think the agd’s are really excellent - and as @twoleftears says one can always go tube linestage into agd power amp for an infusion of tubey goodness with very few of the downsides relative to what may be your current, traditional tube amp, i really don’t think there are any downsides... or rather, maybe there are simply 7500 of them 🤣 |
Look, you guys are spending a lot of time, effort, and money trying to find out which class D amp is worth listening to, and I appreciate that, but Jonathan Valin has already done all the important work for you. As he said in the most recent issue of TAS, the Aavik P-580 is the FIRST class D amp that, in his HUGE experience, is worth listening to! So rejoice, start saving, and then go out and get one! |
- 172 posts total