@bdp24 ”Authoritarians hate intelligence.” Ain’t it the truth.
Authoritarianism, in practice, has obviously yielded bad results throughout history. But an individual adopting authoritarian thinking, while perhaps not actually making laws or issuing tangible punishment to dissenters, is also destructive. This type of thinking is immune to political ideology.
An artist like the Velvet Underground who says, “we don’t cotton to this trendy hippy nonsense. We are going to do our own thing,” is reviled because of their distinct break with the prevailing trend. The authoritarian thinking here is, “we don’t wear all-black, leather and shades. We don’t do that around here. We wear paisley, tie dye, bell-bottoms, and denim. We don’t sing honest depictions of S&M, heroin and amphetamine use, sodomy, transgenderism, and violence. We sing songs about being anti-war, pro-peace/love, and pro-hallucinogen and pot use. We do make exceptions for Northerners and Californians appropriating rural southern/Appalachian sounds à la The Band and Sweetheart of the Rodeo. We also make exceptions for Brits appropriating southern rural American blues sounds à la The Yardbirds, Cream, The Rolling Stones, Led Zeppelin, and John Mayall and the Blues Breakers.”
Wouldn’t ya know it…50 years later, those VU albums are considered pop music milestones and no one today gives a hoot ‘n heck about Country Joe and the Fish and the Flying Burrito Brothers.
Dylan, of all people, had to deal with virulent opposition to his artistic choices. For the egregious crime of having electric guitars, organ/piano, bass and drums in lieu of a solitary acoustic guitar and braying harmonica, and choosing to sing lyrics that were not explicit, pointed critiques of injustice and social ills, he was charged with being a sell-out, a heretic, and a traitor.
Wouldn’t ya know it…the majority of people today will listen to Highway 61 Revisited and Blonde on Blonde 20 times before giving a solitary spin to The Freewheelin’ Bob Dylan or The Times They Are a-Changin’.
The group-think that typifies an all-too-consequential contingent of today’s population is very similar to these things from the ‘60s.
Any artist who deviates from the established dogma and orthodoxy of speech and ideation is branded as a conservative, a bigot, and a social problem. Any question posed to these precepts, regardless of its validity, is deemed an act tantamount to tacit endorsement of bigotry, hatred, and modern conservative ideology.