MoFi controversy

I am still stuck at people spending a $100+ for a record?

It's what a person spends on food in Eastern Europe in 2 to 3 weeks. 

I feel bad when I pay more than $10 for a used record. 

This wealth and spending is beyond my imagination. 

From that point of view, MoFi has created a miracle drug. 

Hey @grislybutter - if you really want to blow your mind, check out Better Records. They recently had a copy of Aja listed for $899! It’s been well cleaned though….

i have a couple of the One Steps, and they sound amazing. I only got them because a dealer took a few of my older audiophile records in trade (which I never listened to). 
 

If this controversy makes the prices of these go down, maybe I would get a few more. If it makes scalpers avoid getting involved, all the better- more for the people who actually listen to them.

I think the guy who made the video is too serious or self righteous when he says he wants “the analogue experience”. Doesn’t he want the best listening experience? I kind of feel sorry for him- he seems like a guy who I is never happy, especially if the value of his Mofi inventory takes a hit because of an issue he helped emerge, which true audiophiles couldn’t care less about.

@sokogear

I should listen to a MoFi record before I judge but I doubt that on my "15 MoFi Record" costing system I would hear a huge difference. But even if there was, I would still buy 10 old albums from the money than one MoFi records.

I love the analog sound and I am very confused about digitally stored content being cut onto a record (or however you say it?)

If it’s digital, isn’t there a simpler way to transfer IT to the customer’s living room?

Having said all that, I am probably in the camp that thinks he loves the analog sound but actually has no clue, I’d only know it’s analog because I see the turntable spinning

The only "controversy" is that they record so much sh*tty music so well.