I used to think that speakers on spikes were the way to roll,but not so much, at least not with my current speakers-Acoustat X.
The acoustats used to have very nice thicker than average spikes.but getting the Acoustats set up just so requires a lot of movement and fooling with toe in ie.
What I notced sans spikes was a more even flow to the music and more cohesion to the sound.If I may ,I'd like to think that the cabinet is more secure when coupled to the floor and more stable than when it's pearched up on spikes.
Since I own the nice Grand Prix audio rack I had spares of the sorbothan dampers and placed them under the speaker instead of spikes.
This was better,very stable image, very tight and deep bass and more of a sense of the sound coming from somewhere other than the speakers themselves, which sounds foolish,but only if you aren't familiar with the big wall of sound some stats can provide.
And that wall of sound isn't a blur of energy.
There's more definition and staging with the speakers placed on the sorbothane than when on the spikes.
I think ,since sorbothane discs aren't all that expensive, and some other spikey footers can be costly,that more folks should forget about the audio hype that has grown around spikes.
Saying this is ironic, because I was once at the fore front of the spike movement.
Not saying spikes aren't necessary, just saying they aren't a universal end by themselves.
The acoustats used to have very nice thicker than average spikes.but getting the Acoustats set up just so requires a lot of movement and fooling with toe in ie.
What I notced sans spikes was a more even flow to the music and more cohesion to the sound.If I may ,I'd like to think that the cabinet is more secure when coupled to the floor and more stable than when it's pearched up on spikes.
Since I own the nice Grand Prix audio rack I had spares of the sorbothan dampers and placed them under the speaker instead of spikes.
This was better,very stable image, very tight and deep bass and more of a sense of the sound coming from somewhere other than the speakers themselves, which sounds foolish,but only if you aren't familiar with the big wall of sound some stats can provide.
And that wall of sound isn't a blur of energy.
There's more definition and staging with the speakers placed on the sorbothane than when on the spikes.
I think ,since sorbothane discs aren't all that expensive, and some other spikey footers can be costly,that more folks should forget about the audio hype that has grown around spikes.
Saying this is ironic, because I was once at the fore front of the spike movement.
Not saying spikes aren't necessary, just saying they aren't a universal end by themselves.