Atma-Sphere Class D… Amazing

@niodari 

+1

@holmz

No I am running Cullen Cables Power Cord. Hope this doesn’t open up a can of worms…. I use them on everything. 

@niodari no he is just brow beating Ralph because he loves his new amplifiers.

Please! 
 

Have a good evening. 

No I am running Cullen Cables Power Cord. Hope this doesn’t open up a can of worms…. I use them on everything

No it is all good. I appreciate your post.

I just assume that it doesn’t matter a whole lot, and it seemed like it would be good to have in here.

If people like their off the shelf Hypex or Purifi based class d amps then they need not look for a superior sounding amplifier.

He did state that he likes Purifi and Hypex, and that they also have published specs and graphs.
So I do not think it is out of line to ask for the graphs.

Being a fanboi of those brand does not automatically exclude one from liking, for instance, Atmasphere or Benchmark. It seemed more like “he has no objective proof that he should like them,” which if that is really what he means, then I cannot find a cogent argument to oppose that view. And I like them without an objective and rational reason to do so.

And let’s be a bit realistic here; we are talking about the best in Class-D…all of which are very good by most standards whetherb they are objective or (unsighted) subjective.

It is not like being about as good a Purifi and Hypex, as good, or a bit better, is very different… they are all very modern amplifiers showing the best of the topology.

and I thought that @pstores posted that he had also tried Purifi and either Hypex or Benchmark, so I am sure that the graphs are likely nothing to be embarrassed about.

He did state that he likes Purifi and Hypex, and that they also have published specs and graphs.
So I do not think it is out of line to ask for the graphs.

Being a fanboi of those brand does not automatically exclude one from liking, for instance, Atmasphere or Benchmark. It seemed more like “he has no objective proof that he should like them,” which if that is really what he means, then I cannot find a cogent argument to oppose that view. And I like them without an objective and rational reason to do so.

Hypex, Orchard, and Purifi are some of the current state of the art performance wise. The publish detailed measurements that give a great deal of insight into the abilities of the designer, the behavior of the product, and how the amp will play with other components. Additionally, they outline and highlight the performance envelope for users. Clearly these companies believe there is some value added by documenting the performance of their products and I for one agree. All properly engineered commercial amps are rigorously tested and measured by their designers so this is not asking for anything they haven't already done. I fail to see any legitimate reason to not share such data. Not everyone can or does find value in such information but that is no reason to piss and moan about those who do. I happen to appreciate products with state of the art performance and elegant engineering, both of which often go hand in hand with transparency from the manufacturer.