Atma-Sphere Class D… Amazing

@aw-agd and for your first post you chose to post on a thread originated by an Atmasphere owner specifically about Atmasphere amplifiers? Were you somehow alerted to this thread by a close associate who has been following this thread?

@ghasley 

I assume @kuribo is a sincere potential customer

I have been using class d amps for more than 25 years. I have followed the tech with great interest over that period. I am currently putting together an active 3 way system and am indeed looking for 6 channels of amplification. With my long history using class d amps, yes, I am a sincere potential customer. I was originally drawn to class d because of its efficiency, form factor, and price/performance. While I can afford to buy whatever I like I still believe in price/performance and with class d amps with stellar performance available these days for incredibly reasonable prices, I don't think it unreasonable to expect to see performance measurements, especially for products that seem grossly out of line price-wise with other market entrants. Of course every manufacturer is free to provide as much or as little detail as possible, that's there choice. The consumer also gets to make a choice.

@noske 


 

That is quite a slab of tests. I think that someone who owns one will drop-ship one over to Amir at ASR. Probably a couple weeks turnaround.

It's quite typical these days. I can assure you most bona fide manufacturers do much more than what I have listed.

My understanding is someone has already sent one for testing, or is in the process. We should know fairly soon how it "measures up".

Yes, I am aware of Atmasphere's recent entry into the class d market. I have already previously remarked that it is an impressive feat for someone who has previously been an exclusive designer of tube amps to make the leap to class d, which I know is a whole different ballgame. Bruno Putzeys once described class d amps as wanting to do everything but make music, or something to that effect, meaning, one must overcome their inherent nature and climb many mountains to tame them. No doubt it is a tribute to Ralph to produce something which on subjective grounds seems to have attracted a following on his first go around.

@ghasley I simply found important to clarify to @noske, the user that called in AGD (and Atmasphere) implying a possible lack of experience (compared to Purifi) on the matter of technology, specifically on Class D and Silicon. I brought to his attention what the fact are. Is it something that is not allowed in this forum?

@aw-agd 




 

With all due respect, Silicon Mosfet cannot compete in performance nor on future FOM (Figure of Merit) improvement with GaN based semiconductors, it is not a matter of opinion, it is physics.

Really? Seems to me as a practical matter, silicon mosfet based class d amps by Hypex and Purifi clearly illustrate performance that not only competes with current GaN amps but in nearly all cases I am familiar with beats them handily in most objective parameters. One can argue that GaN devices offer inherent advantages over silicon mosfets, but unless the implementation exploits those advantages, it is all just a marketing scam. To date I have seen many GaN amp's brought to market, few that actualize these theoretical advantages.