What is your take on high efficient speakers vs. low efficient speakers?


Consider both designs are done right and your other equipment is well matched with the speakers.  Do you have any preference when it comes to sound quality?  Is it matter of economic decision when it comes to price? - power amps can become very expensive when power goes up, on the other hand large,  efficient speakers are expensive as well.  Is your decision based on room size?  I'd love to hear from you on the subject. 

128x128tannoy56

I like speakers that are true solid 96 db and up! So I can use use El-84, El34, 2A3 & big triodes like 805 etc.! Enjoy!😊

I agree with Clear Thinker that it's a matter of what you like. I have three pairs of Maggies and swear by them - even though they're notoriously inefficient,  The largest pair -- in a room which is 32' by 18' -- is drriven with an amp ofd 250 watts per channel --  loud enough to make the neighborhoods complain were in not for the fact that the house is deep in the woods.  

@atmasphere wrote:

My Classic Audio Loudspeakers are 98dB and flat to 20Hz. They employ dual 15" woofers as well as field coils to reduce distortion and compression while increasing speed.

I guess one could even argue, given their 16-ohm load, that they're 101dB sensitive from the usual 8 ohm standard sensitivity is measured by. Not to mention that many speakers today are closer to a 4-ohm load, yet without being accurately reflected by their sensitivity rating.. 

^^ Yes. The difference between sensitivity and efficiency specs is poorly understood. You have to do math to convert from one to the other unless the speaker impedance is 8 Ohms.

What a thread...

Is a speaker with 88db sensitivity at 8 ohms or an 88db sensitivity at 4 ohms more "efficient"?

Having listened to gear for 20 years and owned a variety of equipment, I tend to associate higher sensitivity with a brighter sound. I lean to lower-sensitivity speakers in general.