Audio Science Review = "The better the measurement, the better the sound" philosophy

@ticat  FACT!

In a recent discussion there was a comment about the Coincidence 300B Frankenstein MkII. I dug around and found this study that was VERY detailed and yet does it cover every aspect that can be calculated, NEVER!

COINCIDENT FRANKENSTEIN 300B SET AMPLIFIER (high-endaudio.com)
But one thing I wanted to extract was about one particular capacitor. It was a .47 uf Teflon Foil film cap. Now do they measure the same? for most aspects they are identical, but most people know that different manufacturers make their products slightly different and the items that we measure are not even part of the consideration. Like what is the gap on the layers of films? What is the length of the film? There are so many factors that make one just slightly different to another. I can’t tell you haw many times I have played with different caps in my speaker crossovers achieving different results and sometimes a lesser expensive one does something more desirable. On the opposite end, often choosing an elite name like say, Morel over a Solen, well not all Morels are created equal. For a fact there are dozens of different grades of Morel caps of the exact same value, and one might fit the bill very well and another totally creates a trashy sound. It depends on the purpose, the design, the expected outcome... and yes often just plain outright COST effectiveness. Also you need to ascertain how a particular component compliments another. Sometimes one more expensive device might have a slight advantage due to something as simple as the reluctance of the binding post, or a .001 uf difference in capacitance, or the type of architecture of the device. We all know it isn't the most advantageous thing to do by putting Digital components with Valve components. You can't just say because of Ohms or watts or $k something is going to be the best choice and something else I seldom see discussed beyond speaker wires is, How long was a combination of components burned in together before it was given its final sanctification. And don't leave out room treatments.

@esarhaddon How would a purchaser know the amount of measurement and testing that went into an audio component? There may be some designers who volunteer that information to the public domain but most do not for a variety of reasons, like not wanting their work to be pirated. And those customers who want to evaluate an amp or a DAC, etc... base their decisions on the sound and the visual aesthetics. Designers have to use testing and measurements to build their products but scientific data isn't what they're selling.

Still don't understand how ASR can claim to be an audio equipment reviewer without actually listening to the audio product being reviewed. 

That is because ASR is an equal opportunity employer and employs deaf reviewers.

They are planning to expand to objective reviews of cars which will allow them to employ blind test drivers.That way people can be sure that all cars have been reviewed under double blind test standards and labels or looks cannot create bias.It will include a witches hat course to test handling and traffic lights to test stopping.