"By introducing some generally accepted scientifically measured reference points we may finally be able to escape from this seemingly inescapable audio maze."
This summarizes ASR's mindset perfectly. And it circles back to the expression: "When holding a hammer, everything looks like nail".
How can audio be a maze when there's no up, down, entry or exit? Audio is too abstract for our human brains, much like the universe. We elaborate theories with equations and graphs to try to understand it. However, this scientific framework locks you into a mindset which could turn you ignorant to other possibilities.
"Still don't understand how ASR can claim to be an audio equipment reviewer without actually listening to the audio product being reviewed."
I have a clear explanation. Floyd Toole listened to many speakers decades ago and determined "the best parameters for speaker design". Therefore, everyone who follows Floyd Toole to the letter doesn't have to listen to speakers anymore. The burden of subjective listening is lifted. It's like forming a mould and comparing everything to that mould. If the reviewed object doesn't fit in the mould then throw it in the trash. Repeat. Do you understand how you save time, effort and "error"?
"A system put toghether from ASR favourites would be very very good. I got one."
If it's good and affordable, then who's complaining?
Ultimately, ASR is a hype machine for affordable and mid-fi products. You'll be disappointed by the big performance claims and the objectivity claims. But if your expectations are low, you can expect a pleasant hi-fi system at affordable prices based on the recommendations.
Just don't interect with ASR. They're very rude (unless you agree with them).
