I second the fiber media converter tactic. It makes a world of difference in the sound.
- ...
- 253 posts total
I too work with computers and in fact, I work with highly complicated global networking. Guess what? Cables absolutely matter and the correct cable for the correct application is critical. I echo the comments about sticking with Cat6 - I have used Audioquest Pearl Cat6a and the results were very good. For a cable run that long you should consider the recommendation around a fibre run however the claimed isolation benefits are reduced as the 10GTek devices are very noisy, especially their cheap-as-chips SMPS (I've trialled a pair of 10GTek's and they aren't great, very cheaply built). Alternatively, look at using Powerline Ethernet Adapters with passthrough sockets - they can yield great results. TP-Link adapters are very well made. If you want to get into fibre in a quality way consider using Cisco switches with Cisco SFPs as they have very high-quality internal power supplies for serious data and voice applications and are intrinsically less noisy. With all of this said, my sound quality improved the most when I switched to using a wireless network bridge (ifi Zen Stream) with a quality WiFi circuit connected to a high-quality WiFi router (TP-Link Deco). For me, this is the cleanest (less cabling mess) and sonically best solution. |
This is a repost of an article that I previously made on CanuckAudioMart REVIEW:What causes audible differences in network cables
|
- 253 posts total