How much is about the recording

The late Rudy Van Gelder once said "I love re-mastering early recordings. Those engineers wore ties to work."

If the sound recording is lousy the performance better be amazing or the record/CD etc. will be relegated to the back of my mind.

An example of studio wizardry rescuing a lost cause is the 2011 release of Robert Johnson: The Centennial Recordings. Steve Lasker and Seth Winner accessed the finest available original and test pressings and, after using the most advanced transfer techniques to capture the source material, removed all the sonic noise (clicks, pops, stripped grooves, etc.) knowing some loss of high-range frequencies was inevitable, resurrecting the clarity of those 1930’s recordings to an astonishing degree. I can listen now without flinching.

my point is that poor recordings can, at great expense, be overcome if the performance warrants the effort.

@russ69 

Given enough tools, I'm pretty sure I could make a bad recording at least sound acceptable. But I still agree with what you are saying.

 

Oh for sure.  Just as radio stations do with compression & graphic equalisation.

In my experience the “better” the hifi (particularly speakers) they could indeed make good recordings sound better than I ever heard, but bad recordings?  They were laid bare & I found I didn’t listen to many of my old favourites anymore.

I was very briefly sucked in by hifi dealers who would switch my music for some whiney woman & it sounded great, but not music I ever want to listen to.

As we know, a lot of guys get obsessed with their boxes.    

I don't have near the audio quality system that most of you have.  I read this forum mostly for info.  But I do own a vintage set of DQ10's and an '80s vintage Proton amp....sister company to NAD I believe.  I'll let my phono and CD player remain un-named as some of you would scoff. LoL  But one thing I really noticed after getting the 10's was the quality of recordings in both formats.  Bad ones sound even more bad.  Most Jazz and Classical sound pretty exceptional...and most electronic as well.  But the rest can run the full gamut from absolute garbage to stellar.  jmho anyway.

@singintheblues

I was very briefly sucked in by hifi dealers who would switch my music for some whiney woman & it sounded great, but not music I ever want to listen to.

This is a common used but altogether highly misleading practice that needs to be challenged wherever it’s encountered.

In such instances the reluctance to vary the musical demonstration material seems almost palpable.

A fear of exposure?

In effect the demonstrators are themselves tacitly admitting that the recording is far more important than the equipment that it’s being played on.

Without actually saying so.

In the meantime the customer is being set up for one huge purchase disappointment.

It’s particularly disgusting to see seasoned reviewers using this same tactic, time and time again.

I don’t think I’ve yet seen a reviewer/ salesman who had similar musical tastes as myself. They either don’t like popular music or don’t like what it tells them about the equipment on review.

When was the last time you heard this at a show?