2. music
  3. 180250-83997

The Beatles Revolver

Just read where Giles Martin is using  AI-powered audio separation technology to remix Revolver. From what I read he can take the mono tracks and separate all the instruments and vocals on the 4 track tape the were recorded on and then I guess remix them in 24 track or whatever he wants. Is this good? I love The Beatles and no matter how much better it my sound it not the same. They had what they had in 1966. And George Martin did wonders with 4 tracks. Where does this reissuing of classic albums stop. Is Revolver remixed in multi tracks still Revolver?

128x128lenmc2964
lenmc2964's avatar
lenmc2964 OP
239 posts
 

Never thought I’d get this kind of response thank you all for posting. I received my single LP copy yesterday and it sounds very good. Still prefer my Mono copy but it sounds good. But I still ask is it still Revolver? Same songs but different album. But if it opens The Beatles music to a new audience I guess it a good thing. And now I have 92 albums by The Beat;es. 

jafant
18,969 posts
 

lenmc2964

 

92 albums, now that , is a Collection!

 

Happy Listening!

kota1
2,706 posts
 

Listened to the Atmos version on Tidal, crystal clear and fresh. Vocals and strings sound amazing.

tylermunns
600 posts
 

Now I’m curious.  I’ve been thrilled by this album in any and every format I’ve heard it.  My most recent purchase was the 1971 UK vinyl reissue.  I loved it.  The best version I’d heard yet (still not yet heard an original).

I really enjoyed Giles’ “White Album” mastering.

gpgr4blu
1,079 posts
 

@tylermunns 

I'm listening to the White album remaster on vinyl right now and just happened to come across your post. I think Giles did a great job as well on the White album. He did an equally great job on Revolver. I like the originals and to me--they are the holy grail, but Giles' remaster is closer to what I think the Beatles would have gone with had they been mixing it today.

More to discover