Streamer/DAC - Where is the value?

So many amazing replies here! I’m leaning my investment into a great DAC first and streamer second. My inclination is separates because I don’t ever think I’ll be done messing around with equipment.

That being said, the Auralic Vega G2.1 is at the top of my list right now. From what I gather the cost is going primarily into the DAC. Auralic makes a separate dedicated digital transport, so the Vega is really all about the DAC which has streaming capabilities. One of the industry people I follow, John Darko, places this DAC near the top of his all time list. 

I just hope they don’t release a new version soon after I buy it!

Hi @jpearson3131  I second the thought that the Mac is not the best.  Much clearer, more resolving components from many companies.  Also, most DACs stream as well.   I have a Tambaqui DAC very top line, but later adding a separate Auralic Aries G2.1 streamer madee a big improvement.  Also I, have an Altair G1in a vacation home, and it is awesome, so I would assume that the nicer Altair G2.1 would be great.  I think easily better than the Cambridge.  GTT sells al the Auralic stuff and Bill has good advice.  An Audionet Watt integrated would blow the socks off the McIntosh.  He could also describe the differences in the Altair and the Vega DACs, since they seem to do similar things.

Lots of great suggestions for a DAC and streamer.  I won't add to the confusion, although I'm partial to separates and Denafripts and Aurenders. My comment is regarding your speakers and amp.  I recently heard (auditioned) your speakers with MAC.  While I'm sure there is better, it was a very nice combination and something I would definitely hang onto for awhile.  Your priority should continue to be the DAC/streamer as you originally asked about.

The new ifi neo stream is worth looking at. Many inputs including optical and a little Oled. Built-in DAC or USB and more outputs gives flexibility for better DAC. I wish it had XLR out, is only provided with RCA analog out