@amir_asr , OK, thanks for sharing. The last time I did the test you just posted was when I auditioned a Mapleshade Digital Interconnect I had for a 30 day trial (about $250). After about 100 hrs of break in I "blind tested" it with my current cable and it was MUCH better so I kept it.
Well you made a big mistake. If I predict the outcome of a coin flip, do you think I can do that forever? It could be pure luck, right? What if I did that twice in a row? Still could be luck. How about 4 times? Yes, it could still be luck. Indeed I have run blind tests where I got it right 4 or 5 times only to completely fail after that.
If you go back to the start of the video I linked to, I explain the above. And how claims of "I ran a blind test" mean nothing unless they are repeated and backed by that statistical analysis to reduce the chances of pure luck. For this reason I keep saying run a test 10 times and see if 8 out of that many tests you can identify the cable.
If a cable is "MUCH" better, you should be able to tell it apart 20 times and still get it right. So fire up your camera, start shooting a video of how many times in a row you can tell that cable from another. Then we have something to talk about. Until then, the only thing you demonstrated is that you still don't know how to properly get to audio truth.
Also, nothing about your anecdote validates the requirement for 100 hours of break in. You need to go and get a fresh cable and compare it to the 100 hour broken one and see if you can get at least 8 out of 10 times right. You say the company gives you 30 days free trial. So when can be expect this result?
Until then, your starting claim in ASR that Audioquest cable needed 100 hours of break in before testing is just nonsense. Heck, that cable is even different than yours so how can you claim both need the same 100 hours???