This thread isn’t about blind testing yet here you are demanding it and then were rude in your reply, how can you get a blind test wrong, you hear what you hear.
Again, I explain this in the video I posted earlier. A single trial like you performed means nothing. You could imagine there is a difference and get lucky by pointing to one product you prefer. It is only true repetition and randomization that we can tell you consistently can find the same attribute.
If you run the test only once and guess "right," there is still 50% chance it was a lucky test. You need to repeat the test and get enough right that probability of guessing shrinks down to less than 5% (p<0.05). If the results are obvious to you, then you should grind that down to 0%. For 10 trials, this requires at least 8 correct guesses.
As to why we are talking about blind tests, folks said they had no use for measurements. I am perfectly fine with that. Use your ears instead and show that you can reliably tell the difference beyond lucky guesses. Do it with your system, your content and as much time as you want to take. Not an onerous ask.
Remember, instrumentation shows that what reaches your ear is no different due to these cable differences. This is why we insist on proper protocol to make sure the improbable thing you say is really there. You understand this, right?