@alexberger
Which modern 6SN7 are better than NOS? I currently use Ken-Rad VT-231 from the 1940s in the input stage of my integrated 300B SET. They are not the most expensive NOS but still to change the pair of these tubes is expensive for me.
I haven’t tried the Chinese 6SN7 that get good ratings (note some of their alternate sub types may draw more heater current!). But the Russian Tung-Sol and EH have a number of advantages:
- Can be easily sourced for low noise and tight matches
- They measure VERY high for transconductance compared to vintage 6SN7. These make GREAT drivers for power tubes.
- The Tung-Sol GTB are rated for much higher plate voltages and dissipation - versus vintage 6SN7GT and VT-231 (and certainly 5692) - which some circuits require. A GT tube in a true GTB slot will not last as long. There are some vintage GTA nd GTB tubes and they can be quite nice, but they don’t have the full-on "sweet tone" of the best old GT’s
In my VAC amps I find good vintage 6SN7GT sound best in V1 slots (I like various Sylvanias, Hytron, and Tung-Sol round plates best, followed by Ken-Rads and then RCAs last). But the Russian Tung-Sol GTB are just hard to beat in the V2 driver slots. They rock there. In V1 slots, the Russian tubes lend a bit too much of a solid-state like quality to the overall sound.
For preamps, old vintage 6SN7 tubes are very hard to source to be quiet enough. Microphonics is a particularly big problem there.
So yeah, as per @atmasphere , it just depends :)