The comparison test was accomplished in my system. I tried the ARC CD3 MKII and the Apollo. In my system there was a significant difference. The issue of something going wrong always exists however my choice for sound was the ARC unit. The build quality of the ARC is better. The cost is more so it will be more expensive to repair upon need. The trade off is the better sound justifies the possibility of a pricey repair. Steve
What's likely to go wrong with a used CD player?
I came close to buying a ARC CD3 that was about 5 years old, had been "well-taken care of" by the owner and he assured he had operated it properly as per leaving it on 24/24. He has been the owner since it was just a few months old. But I just couldn't pull the trigger.
All I could think of is sure it's been problem free for 5 years, but the problems start after I take it over.
So considering the reputation of ARC gear, build quality, yada yada yada, and that hopefully it has had a good home, am I worrying needlessly and passing on what seemed to me to be a pretty good deal.
My primary interest in this player, other than the fact that it is an ARC is I'm looking to upgrade from my Rega Apollo to a balanced CD player to go with my upgraded system of a balanced preamp and balanced power amp.
Thanks for any thoughts,
Gene
All I could think of is sure it's been problem free for 5 years, but the problems start after I take it over.
So considering the reputation of ARC gear, build quality, yada yada yada, and that hopefully it has had a good home, am I worrying needlessly and passing on what seemed to me to be a pretty good deal.
My primary interest in this player, other than the fact that it is an ARC is I'm looking to upgrade from my Rega Apollo to a balanced CD player to go with my upgraded system of a balanced preamp and balanced power amp.
Thanks for any thoughts,
Gene
- ...
- 7 posts total
- 7 posts total