Anotherspeaker placement question (distance measurements)

@immatthewj  I start with the triangle rule and kerp in mind it's not the law.  Many suggest trying to keep the distance between speakers not less than 75% of the distance to your chair. Once I have my chair set, I will stand behind the speaker and aim them to focus just behind my head.  Once again, it's what works for you.  All these rules are only guidance to help each room and system give max enjoyment.  Have fun with it.  

@bigtwin , mid range/woofer driver distance was a typo: 32.75 not 33.75.

Last night, after I finished typing, I got back in The Room & did some repositioning (but no listening as of yet).

                                   One thing I did determine, if I’ve got it correctly, with mid range/woofer driver distance being ’dimension C’ moving speaker out from rear wall means speakers also need to move in from side wall in order for the formula of: (BxB) divided by A = C (since in my case C, woofer/midrange distance is a fixed dimension).

So what that means (in a small area such as mine) is: limitations are placed on how far the speaker can move off the rear wall as when the speakers correspondingly move in from the sidewalls they get closer together. I would think that being too close together could not be lateral soundstage friendly(?) but I guess there is one way to find out.

My back wall is clean, meaning that there is nothing between the speakers and the wall.

What I am calling my sidewalls are not really walls, I should probably start referring to them as side boundaries, and that, unfortunately is not an option to play with, other than doing a 90 degree relocation with the speakers. The left boundary (I have been calling a wall for measurement purposes) is a gun safe and a file cabinet, this boundary is an even flat plane, about 5’ high (higher than the speakers) and doubles as my equipment rack. (Therefore, my electronics are all off to the left side and not between or behind the speakers.)

The right boundary which I have been referring to as a wall for the purposes of measurements is a relatively flat/even plane made up of a file cabinet (again about 5’ high) and book case with books and CDs going to the ceiling. (The wall behind the listening position is book case going to the ceiling.)

I am fully cognizant that this is way less than ideal, but in the past I have been able to reproduce a lateral soundstage that exceeds the boundaries, and plenty of height. Front to back has been filled, but I never got as much placement of detail from fore to aft as I do side to side.

I have recently been using about four well mastered.mixed SACDs for evaluating; they all have revealing imaging in various locations going on.

"I ain’t ever satisfied," Steve Earle wrote a song by that title.

@bigtwin , with the adjustable dimensions from the formula that I used to achieve 32.75 (or quite close) I did some listening. These dimensions put my speakers closer to the rear wall and further from the side boundaries,and since being further from the side boundaries moved them closer together, I had to move my listening position in significantly which, needless to say, increased the space between me and the book shelf covering the back wall.

"Comparisons are odious." I don’t know about that, but I hate doing them. It seems like when I try, I am never positive about what I heard the last time that I am attempting to compare to.

Anyway, what I feel that I might have noted (how’s that for being definitive?) is that the lateral sound stage is not as dramatic now; it still extends beyond the the speakers, but it doesn’t seem like (maybe) it is as far beyond the speakers. I always did & still do have great center imaging. However, I do think that (maybe) I am hearing more of a fullness from the forward plane of my soundstage to the back of my sound stage. However, the imaging within fore to aft is not as precise & revealing as from left to right & it never was. I don’t feel that height of the sound stage was affected, or if so, not by much.

One thing for sure, I previously made some comments about needing to turn off the lights & close my eyes or it was like sticking a pin in the balloon of my soundstage, and now with the speakers closer together & me even closer to them it is twice as true.

I am thinking that it would be the speaker placement from the side boundaries that would affect the lateral soundstage the most?

Next time I evaluate I’ll tweak only that dimension a bit and see what happens.. Like maybe an inch. I am also thinking I’ll hang some wool blankets on the side boundaries and if that is an improvement I will seriously start considering some type of room treatment beyond that. I have been playing the same three SACDs every time I do this, and I’d kind of like to listen to something else, but I am afraid that would really screw up my ability to compare.

Let’s address the elephant in the room — what are your room dimensions and on what wall are your speakers situated?  Not sure why this critical info has to be a national secret.  Sheesh. 

So, it is really true. Formula are simply a starting point. For me, I did my movements over a year. I plunked them in the prescribed place. And listened for a couple months (they are really awesome speakers). I realized they were capable of disappearing, but were not and the soundstage was restricted. So, I toed them out some. Listened for a couple weeks. No question… better. Moved again. Better. Some folks move, listen, move, listen… in a day. I find that confusing. I prefer listening to the music and wholisticly appraising the change.

Thank you, @ghdprentice  , I am keeping this in mind as I work on this.  You are more patient than I am.  I am often lazy, but less often patient.  I am using the formula that bigtwin provided as a place to start from this time around.  In the past it was always how far do I think I can get away (get away from a sonic perspective, not the perspective as 'am I allowed to') pull them out & spread them a part.  This is about as scientific as I have ever got with this aspect of the hobby.