Relative Importance of Analog Components
We see people struggling with what to upgrade next, or where to direct their attention if everything seems to be working fairly well. I'm probably a bit more inclined to give more importance to sources and less to speakers than most people, but in general I like to look at which component is the 'rate-limiting factor' which one holds back the rest and then concentrate on improving that.
But to look specifically at vinyl reproduction, I have the strong impression that out of the four main components, they can be ordered in importance of potential effect on sound like this:
Cartridge
Phono stage
Tonearm
Turntable
I'm sure other people would list those four in a different order. How would you rank them and why?
It’s only as good as the weakest link. The turntable must 1.) be pitch correct, 2.) be tonally neutral & 3.) provide relative isolation from mechanical & acoustical noise The cartridge must work mechanically perfect with the tonearm and electrically perfect with the preamp (including cables) That’s it. Money be dammed if the tasks are accomplished. |
@grislybutter I see you have Picked Up on the Analog Forums exchanges, and now found your Niche Voice. Welcome, I look forward to your contributions that are Worthwhile Considering, if ever, any are to be found. I'll just keep on being the me, I choose to be, on the Gon Analog Forum Thank You, it makes me smile quite a lot. |
Ah. I shall, briefly, fantasise about our two most prolix members having their own subforum, in which they can drown each other in words. Unfortunately, this won't help clarify my question much. I'm content with my view, but I'm fascinated that other views exist, some of them ordering the parts in the exact opposite of my ranking. There really isn't a right answer, except theoretically, because the weakest link in anyone's chain will always demand attention. |
