Musical Fidelity A5 CDP


Does this machine still cut the mustard? There are so many new players to choose from now including the new Tri CD4SE (sounded very nice to my ears), Cambridge Audio C840, Astin Trew 3000 & 3500 and the beautiful Raysonic 128 & 168. Should I just look at the others or is the A5 still worth a listen too? They can be had for the same price as these others now.
omegaspeedy
Hi Countingbackwards, I prefer the thick solid sound with full body of the value CD players (not that i'm saying valves over colour music). I had a Shanling CD3000 and loved the sound but missed the PRaT so was hoping for something that did both. The MF A5 having a valve buffer stage had me thinking it might do both better? Are there any MFA5 owners who could verify this?
I own the A5 (so take anything I type with a grain of salt) and find it to be an excellent CDP. Perfect for everyone? Heck no, and thank goodness for different tastes. But it is very resolving and the soundstaging is especially excellent.

I know this is a lame description, but I find it sort of "elegant sounding." It is not as thick and full bodied as two less expensive tubed CDP I have tried in my system, a Njoe Tjoeb with upsampler and the Jolida, both with NOS tubes. In my system, the A5 was better than both of those (perhaps not surprising given in costs twice as much); it was also a bit more shy in bass and had less body in the mids -- both of these tube players were pretty thick through the mids.

So I would not call it the most full bodied player I have ever heard, but it is highly resolving and well balanced -- again, in my system. So judging by your goals, it may not be your ideal CDP. Again, in my opinion, the A5 is a very good CDP overall, just perhaps not exactly what you might be looking for.

Good luck.
Bob
My feeling is that you should be looking at Naim for a "thick" sound that also brings plenty of PRaT. Also, while I haven't heard it yet, I'd presume (based on their house sound) that the new Bryston player may fit your needs too.