MQA will only ever prove to be false. They can't sell it, new engineers would spill the beans. They already sent the money to Switzerland.
Tidal doesn't tell you very much about MQA at all. You find out later that everything is being streamed as MQA 44.1, your cpu handles 'unfolding' until 96khz, but you need their little chip to go up to 192. And you won't get identical output to what your gear would be doing if Tidal had streamed the unaltered higher res.
You can't go too wrong if you avoid the scam plan you showed, that says it's better than basic 44.1, I don't know what they do to change the 44.1's to 44.1 mqa, but in that case any addition would only make them have to stream that bit more.
No, you don't see them say too much about mqa. The technology's purpose is designed to give you higher res without the servers having to use more bandwidth than 44.1. But it doesn't work, and they still just charge you double anyway. Double burn for you. Anybody on Tidal with that plan is burned, unless playing a 44.1 track, except it says it's mqa, so we don't even know if they have the original track. There is no question that the original files would be fine. It's MQA's job to be able to prove that their versions turn out identical, which is not going to be possible in the first place. There is no reason for the consumer to worry about fraudulent mqa files, any difference to the original can only be worse. This is why it is good news that mqa is shutting down. They are trying to tell you that Master Quality Authenticated files sound better than higher res files. Well, it could have a nice ring to it compared to the more grass-roots sounding 'higher res', but it doesn't work, it measures badly, they lied. We don't want MQA. MQA sounds like My Queer Ambitions. The injured\damaged party is anyone who is or has been paying for the plan you quoted. You got noise instead of the originals.
