Still you do not address the fact that you you continue to recommend products after they have been shown to have poor build quality. Ashamed or embarrassed perhaps?
To answer your question, Why do you not do your own research and look at Erin's site?l.
Addressing last part first, I told you that Erin uses the same Klippel NFS system that I have. Indeed, he purchased his after I did. You vehemently disagreed so I asked you to tell me what gear he is using. Clearly you got the answer: he uses the same machine and even same protocol and reporting. So in the future, please don't shoot from the hip without getting your facts straight first.
On the first comment, there is not one audio reviewer who provides what you are demanding. Stereophile, Absolute Sound, etc. all publish recommended yearly list of gear. Not once do they follow up with any reliability comments or corrections.
On my side, to anyone with common sense, it is clear that I am testing the performance of a product, not its short or long term reliability. If I see a problem during testing, I will absolutely stop, note it and review is aborted. See this example: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/behringer-b2031a-measurement-broken-sample.31717/
![](https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?attachments/behringer-b2031a-frequency-response-broken-sample-png.192457/)
You also say I "keep" recommending. I don't do any such thing. I recommend a product based testing I performed at the time. Not at the current moment.
All of this said, if people bring it to my attention that something is seriously wrong, I will go back and address. At times, I have actually have gone and bought the product at my expense (if I still don't have it) and verify the issue. This is then noted and if I have leverage with a manufacturer, I put pressure on them to fix. Here again is an example: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/smsl-m500-dac-and-hp-amp-review.9606/post-822300
"I finally got a chance to confirm the problem with the right channel being driven by itself causing much higher distortion. Review is updated with it:
![](https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?attachments/smsl-m500-left-channel-distortion-bug-png.136557/)
Recommendation of the product has been deleted in the review and members are cautioned about this problem.
I have also formally asked SMSL to respond to this issue."
When the response didn't come in a timely and proper manner, I pushed harder resulting in company setting up local firmware updates in both US and Europe.
Ultimately it is just one of me and hundreds of products being reviewed each. My job is to evaluate them from performance point of view using specialized equipment knowledge. You all bear the responsibility to figure out if the product is reliable or functional. Fortunately, ASR Forum is a wonderful resource for this. Review threads routinely never die with owners posting questions, comments, etc. Manufacturers routinely read and follow these threads as well. So while not ideal, what you are demanding is happening.
If you want more, then you need to become part of the solution than the problem. Don't keep throwing rocks and false talking points as what we are doing on ASR. Help support the activity so that over time, there can be more resources than just me to follow up on products and extend the reach of what we are doing.