Phono cable (RCA-RCA) from TT to Phono Pre Question

Not too many years past I was invited to a Bake Off between RCA>RCA Phono Cables. The Cables were priced between low  £100's and £500ish, it is not easy to recollect everything.

There were 3 X Zafino Cables from differing prices, I recall one being Silver..

I also recall another Brands Silver Cable was unbearable, in relation to produced Sonic.

I supplied my own Silver Wire Cable to the line up as well. 

The Set Up was SME 20/12 >Cart'? > Graff OTL Valve Amp > Quad ESL

The System Owner selected a Copper Wire Cable at apprx' £160

I preferred a Different Copper Wire Cable to the one selected. 

It is difficult to recommend a Cable, there are differences that are detectable. 

Buying at a price that enables a turnover of Wire Types and Cable assemblies will supply a better understanding of how the Interface impacts on a System. 

For The Record, today I use PC Triple C Wire Cable in place of my Silver Cable of old, at present, it is difficult to imagine how this Wire Type can be bettered within my own system. 

@mmcgill829 If you have a MM high output cartridge, the inductance of the cartridge and the capacitance of the cable set up an electrical resonance that might be ultrasonic or might be at the high end of the audio band. It might also be as much as a 20dB boost. So it can result in brightness and will enhance ticks and pops.

As a general rule of thumb the phono cable will not exceed 100pf overall. This assumes a 1 meter length meaning you want the cable capacitance to be 30pf or less per foot.

If you have a high output cartridge, this means your existing cables are making the highs bright. So this is worth fixing.

@atmasphere I suppose I left out an important piece of information in my post...

I use a Hana ML and have pretty much exclusively used LOMC cartridges for quite some time.

@mmcgill829 You still have the issue of the cable capacitance in parallel with the inductance of the cartridge, but now the inductance is much lower and higher ’Q’ (Quality, which is to say the inductor is wider in diameter than it is long). This results in a higher peaked resonance, about 30dB at a much higher frequency.

If untreated it injects Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) directly into the input of your phono section. It is for this reason you may wind up using a ’cartridge loading’ resistor, which detunes that resonance.

Again though, it is helpful to keep that resonance as high as possible, since it might help prevent the phono section from reacting to it. So changing cables might help. What is of greater importance is preventing overload of the phono section by that RFI. The loading resistor does that; but at a price- it causes the cantilever to be stiffer, which might affect how the tonearm tracks.

Some phono sections are immune to the RFI so don’t need the loading resistor.

Have you looked into the loading issue?

@atmasphere I'll admit - most of that went over my head.

I don't really have any *problems* with the sound coming out of my analog system that I can tell, and don't know what 'loading issue' you're referring to, but was mostly curious if I was being told the right thing or not about cable choice for table to phono pre-amp and if so, what I should be looking for instead.

My table uses a Cardas phono interface to allow use of RCA cables, so was just using a set of what I use for everything else in my system, but have no idea if I'm losing anything by using them vs something more specialized - or if these are inadvertently causing any issues that I don't hear because I've just used these for the longest time. In theory, if the cable isn't really ideal that's an easy fix, though finding manufacturers that post capacitance figures is...difficult at best.

So it's more of a 'am I missing an extra 5% of quality because of a dumb cable choice' question.