Hopelessly mid fi?


I recently hooked up an 80 gb ipod to my system through an Apple dock and did an A/B with my CD player. I am able to match the db level between the two via the volume control on the CDP, and switch between sources instantaneously for a meaningful comparison. Much to my chagrin, the difference was minimal at best. So I brought in a Squeezebox and hooked a digital IC into the CDP's DAC with similar results using both compressed (AAC 192) and Apple Lossless formats. From what I have read on this site, I assumed that it shouldn't be possible that compressed or streaming digital should rival the sound of, by all accounts, a reputable CDP (name intentionally withheld). But it does.

Is it possible to assemble a digital front-end, for say, less than $2K, that would produce a meaningful improvement over both the ipod and Squeezebox? An external DAC perhaps? Or is my system simply not capable of resolving the differences? I'd prefer not to overhaul the rest of my system if possible which includes an Odyssey Candella preamp and Extreme mono amps, Von Schwiekert VR-4jr speakers and Virtual Dynamic Nite II cables.

Thanks for your thoughts.
sydneysophia
It shouldn't matter what type of music it is, I can tell that right now and I am listening to lossless Audioslave, and I have probably one of the worst systems on this site. The difference in every instrument is instantly recognizable. Guitars are sharper and quicker, bass drums tight, cymbals crisp, vocals clearer. You have to have a problem upstream or with the room.
If you are comparing the cd to mp3, amd the cd is commercial pop or rock 1980's), (some of) those recordings on cd were poory recorded, with low dynamics and compressed. They actually may not be distinguishable from an mp3 on some systems. I know they sound pretty poor on mine.
Something to consider, when interfacing with your computer: (http://www.stereophile.com/digitalprocessors/731/)
Rodman
Nice article... a bit dated but good thoughts there.

Syd
My exp has been such that once a prime digital source has been selected. One capable of conveying all the info it gets from the presented media, changes to the down stream items & accessories yields still more benefits.

The media too, as was noted can effectively lift system performance, albeit not nearly so much... but still some.

given your desire to not pursue wholesale chages, and the items you now own aren't bad ones, nice in fact, I'd consider moves surrounding the source, and the way it delivers it's info to the preamp, first.

Every system I've had which used a preamp, the preamp can be (and IMO), is as important as the source. In other words I put as much $$$ or more into the preamp as I do the source... routinely.

owning a lesser Odyseey amp, it does respond well to isolation, and power cable changes. So there's that.

The bottom line for me as of late has been this... "If you like what you are getting, keep doing what you are doing. If not, change what you can, when you can. Everything makes a diff in a good audio system."

AS was noted too, other musical content/genre than rock & pop will reveal more overall sonic qualities.

Using the best recorded media seems to me the best way to establish and monitor changes in performance as ones sytem develops... whether I like the genre or not to begin with. Actually this path also unlocked for me new doors to audio and has since allowed me personal growth in music appreciation. My horizons have been broadened, let's say.

In fact, due to the quality of the recordings in some of these other musical areas, I now prefer them to my staples of blues & alternative music. Sheesh, I'm even digging big band jazz lately! hampton, Miller, Pepper, Goodwin, Jacquette, Nocturne, and others. Dare I say it? yeah, classical too just recently.

Again, "If ya like what you're getting...."
Some facts(regarding Digital audio and music reproduction) are not going to change any time soon: (http://home.swbell.net/ronsuthe/technology.html)