I can't say that one technology in itself would answer your needs better than another. Other factors influence the final result so that two units can sound different whether or not they are both OS, NOS, US or whatever.
IME the ideal DAC for rock was the old Apogee DA-1000E-20, an oversampling design. What a punchy piece of gear. Great harmonics too, for those times when the guys sing in chorus.
Hard to find that DAC today in working order. To judge by it, though, there's no reason to avoid oversampling. Upsampling (not the same thing as oversampling) in my book is not worth going out of your way for. It just comes along with many DACs today, since the chips are made for 24/96 anyway.
There's an Apogee Mini-DAC up for sale here right now. Not the same design as the DA-1000, but actually I think it's better in the highs. It's a dual-clock design, it re-times the signal in the DAC to squash jitter.
Use a 1.5 meter-long coax digital cable to get the best definition out of your setup, at any frequency. The extra length keeps reflections within the cable from upsetting timing at the DAC end.
IME the ideal DAC for rock was the old Apogee DA-1000E-20, an oversampling design. What a punchy piece of gear. Great harmonics too, for those times when the guys sing in chorus.
Hard to find that DAC today in working order. To judge by it, though, there's no reason to avoid oversampling. Upsampling (not the same thing as oversampling) in my book is not worth going out of your way for. It just comes along with many DACs today, since the chips are made for 24/96 anyway.
There's an Apogee Mini-DAC up for sale here right now. Not the same design as the DA-1000, but actually I think it's better in the highs. It's a dual-clock design, it re-times the signal in the DAC to squash jitter.
Use a 1.5 meter-long coax digital cable to get the best definition out of your setup, at any frequency. The extra length keeps reflections within the cable from upsetting timing at the DAC end.