Stack Audio Auva Isolator

I did a comparison of the EQs and the Critical Mass CMS2s under my RCM Theriaa phono stage. The Critical Mass were better. More clarity at both frequency extremes and a deeper soundstage with sharper images. As much as I wanted the EQs to be equivalent or better given the amount of money I would save, the CMS were clearly better. As they should be, at many multiples of the price of the EQs. For their price, the AUVA EQs are indeed very good.

Products such as these made with right angles sitting on points that have only one angle are inferior. Like a speaker in a box with no analysis or path to reduce baffle step or diffraction on any exterior surface in sight. Certainly none out of sight. That be the box Bob. Tom D

theaudiotweak,

You evidently don’t know what these products are.

wcheng2,

I agree with you the CM 2M are pretty fantastic. But under speakers the Stack Audio 100 are very good. And for the type and shape of my speakers they are better than anything else I have tried.

ozzy

Go stand in a corner and talk to yourself or put your head in a box. 

Do you sound better or just different?

I posted my patent number here early on about how materials and their shapes reduce resonance interference.

Shape is a vital component as is shear velocity. Keep buying the same old reconstituted ideas, materials and shapes as isolation can only exist in the absence of matter. Think about that for more than a minute. 

Tom D

Your speakers aren’t in a box and they have rounded edges to reduce reflection back into the vibrating membrane.

That’s only 1 way to reduce corruption of the intended signal and reduce interfering energy that becomes a part of the musical chain...to your body, ears and brain.

Tom D