Klipsch La Scala or Altec 838 speakers

Never klipsch 

I still find it remarkable that in answer to a simple either/or question all the “experts” come in out of the woodwork to recommend anything BUT the two choices given by the OP.

My vote is with LaScalas, but I’ve been a Klipsch fan since 1973-ish working in a music store and I’ve also owned Ohm Walsh 2’s and 3’s (sold recently).

I prefer the Klipsch Heresy IV’s but lately I’ve been using a pair of Ubiquitous V2 speakers and Subiguitous subs - I replaced the drivers and tweeters in the V2’s and will be listening to those for as long as I’m on the planet, or until I win the lottery and can afford a new set of something like German Physik omnis.

Get the LaScalas, if they don’t work for you I’m sure they’ll sell.

I have had LaScala's, currently have Klipschorns and Altec 604E and Klipsch Heresy's.  My opinion is there are equally satisfying but in different ways. Properly set up the LaScala's are very good and I would vote for them.

Decades ago, I had an opportunity to choose beteeen Klipsch La Scala and Altec 604Cs.

Speakers aren’t everything. It depends what you match them with. At the time, it was the Dyna Stereo 70 I had built myself when I was 14.

I chose the Altec 604Cs.

The Stereo 70 got replaced with a pair of Dyna MK IIIs, and then the Futtermans. The Futtermans are amazing. I tried other speakers: in particular, Duntech and Klipsch again. But the Futtermans love the Altecs.

It’s been Altec 604Cs, with a pair of Ds as backup. Which is a little OCD because I take care of the Cs: remagnitizing and reconing them every 15 years.

Each time, I found the Klipsch to be softer, … weaker somehow. Good for classical, but not for other material that wants more presence.

Each can have the shouty thing, but that’s corrected with better crossovers, the right tubes, and a device to (subtly) manipulate the phasing.

But basically, for me, it has been Altec for 46 years.

You may feel differently however.

That last sentence sorta negated everything didn’t it?