I'm new to Step Up Transformers


     I've recently become aware of the existence of SUTs (step up transformers). My initial thought was " why do I need an SUT when my phono preamp (Zestos Andros PS-1) has a circuit for Low Output MC cartridges?
     But many people seem to think that an SUT plugged into the MM channel of the phono stage will be a massive upgrade. I'd love to hear the opinions of anyone who has experience with SUTs. Thanks!

128x128rmcfee

rmcfee, I’m glad I am able to share my experience with you about SUT’s. Mine journey began when I first purchased a Denon step up for my Denon cartridge. I then picked up a Ortofon and after an expensive active tube based Klimo. From there I started to realize that these things make a difference. I listened to my friends AudioNote and even though it worked great in his system, for mine it was too clean and lacking body. In his setup, it sounded great. I listened to a bunch more till I found around 7 that I liked best for me. Don’t think that because a transformer matches well in someone’s system that it will sound good in yours even if you own the same cartridge. Your system (cables, tonearm, preamp, listening room) is unique and you’ll need to hear it in your system and find the best sounding and matching SUT’s not just for your Cartridge alone, but for the system. If I were you, I would begin with searching on the web what the majority recommend what SUT’s with your cartridge. You might get a few and find them very good, but if you keeping going, eventually you’ll find the one that matches really nice with your system. 

To me, the real purpose of SUT's is to allow the use of a low output MC cartridge with a MM only phono stage. I recently replaced the McIntosh preamp in my main setup with the new Marantz AV10 processor.  It has terrific specs and very low noise, but it only has a MM phono stage, while the I have a low output MC cartridge on that turntable.  So I bought a SUT so that I could connect directly to the phono input on the Marantz.  It works just as anticipated, but I would not say it is better sounding than using the same table' and cartridge going to the MC input of the McIntosh.  

There is no better or worse here. It’s what works out in your system. I’ve heard inexpensive amps outperform expensive amps in a particular setup. So using the MC section of a very good phonostage doesn’t mean it will sound better or worse than using the MM with a SUT. If someone has great synergy with the built in MC then they are fortunate. But if the built in MC isn’t a good sonic balance with the cartridge, a person has a ton of flexibility using the MM section and exploring the many SUT’s available.  In my experience, it works out exceptionally well in getting the correct balance, - detail, dynamics, fullness, transparency, naturalness, etc. 

Keep in mind that what you’re proposing, assembling essentially a collection of SUTs so one can experiment with mating to one or several LOMC cartridges in pursuit of a best match, can easily become very expensive, time consuming, and possibly so troublesome as to discourage one from pursuing the hobby at all. Perhaps it works for you, but it’s not tenable for everyone who otherwise wants to use vinyl as a source.

It sure is an expensive pursuit.  My Consolidated Silver cost $5,500, my Bob's Devices was $1,200.  I believe the Ortofon is now around $1,800.  To these prices you need to add interconnects.  It is a lot easier, cheaper and cleaner to just buy a good high gain phono stage.  My PS Audio Stellar has that capability which is why I bought it.  In fact it is what I am listening to today in my new system.  It makes more sense to join a club if possible that accommodates member loans/exchanges or at least get togethers to try different SUTs or what not.