Vinyl sounds better (shots fired)


I was bored today on a support job so I made a meme. This isn’t a hard or serious conviction of mine, but I am interested in getting reactions 😁

 

https://photos.app.goo.gl/SEHyirjJEaNXydfu9

medium_grade

@larsman +1

Vinyl treated well and kept clean should have few if any clicks and pops. I don't mind getting up every 20 minutes to cross the room - I need the exercise! I like vinyl, digital, whatever; first and foremost is the MUSIC. 

I may even add CDs, and --gasp-- cassettes!

@grislybutter Fav of mine is the Yes from the 'hipsters/movies' box....

Obviously delusional.....not to be tempted to own Anything dragging miniscule rocks in plastic grooves that aren't even straight....

(Pardon me while I light this blunt with my flint kit...)

I remember one crazed day a bunch of us louts took a shotgun and some decrepit LP's into the hills and had our way with them....

Don't cry, the content would have rated a W (Worthless)....hadn't seen a sleeve in years....

The skid marks from the pellets gave them more interest then they'd ever had before. 

Digital recording has a hard ceiling and a hard floor. Meaning, when your recording level is all '1s' anything a ove that is clipped, totally. Anything below all '0s' doesn't exist. Analog had 3-6dB headroom above 0dB and at least 10dB below the noise floor. Recording and mastering engineers had to re.earn a careers full of technique to go digital.

Similarly, low level information, ambiance, string sounds, the difference between a Stradivarius and other violins, a Strat vs. a Les Paul,  has fewer bits with which to be described, thus less detail is captured. Note this is y-axis data, and has nothing to with sample rate and Nyquist Theory - that's all x-axis. 

Digital has this limited operating 'space' to which the recordings must be confined. Analog is much more forgiving in that regard. To get a digital recording space that is greater than analog requires enlarging both bit depth and sample rate. 24-bit and 96KHz sampling accomplish that, but that was not technically oe economically feasible for a mass market product when the  16-bit, 44.1Khz sample rate CD was developed. 

The final piece of the puzzle is the DAC. Analogous to the role of the phono cart, it is the transducer between the digital and analog domains, just as the phono cart is the transducer between mechanical and analog domains. And while there's are lots of ways to convert all the bits successfully, reconstructing them into an analog signal absent distortion artifacts require a 'reconstruction filter'. It is in the execution of that where a DAC adds the vast majority of its audible signature. 

@grislybutter ....*L*  Since clarity 'round here counts....

Which 'mine' is yours? ;)

-hipster movies, with or without...
-rocks in grooves....(Not 'that rock' or 'that groove')
-a blunt; dosage your call
-shotguns, gauge   "     "
-W LP's, with or without skids

As for attending louts....anyone wanting to attend the next 'shoot-up'....
Bring your own gun and loads of preference....

Vaguely related note, bid and won 'bout a dozen transcription discs of varied conditions, 'white rust'..... old musical bits, the 'in-show' commercials per the labels.  Bought for the *Grins* of it.....
Thinking of making some sort of floor lamp, chandelier....too 'quaint' to shatter loutishwise........show some semblance of surly to the style... 

...turn one to on/dim/off....changes disc every time you use it....