Hagerman Piccolo Zero: New transimpedance head amp


I recently received my brand new (recently released) Piccolo Zero "transimpedance" MC head amplifier. Its sounds awesome! And it already completes for my favor with some good SUT’s - and perhaps more. Pretty certain I already prefer it to voltage-mode JFET head amps. Jim Hagerman commented he might not prefer this head amp for (say) Earth Wind and Fire, but thus far I find no need to qualify its performance by genre or complexity of music. For $250, this product is simply awesome. Maybe all the folks here raving about this transimpedance approach, and eschewing SUTs (Raul), were correct after all 😅

BUT, how to make sense of Piccolo Zero’s specified "gain" ratings? And how to predict matching to a given cartridge? The manual states the following gain levels:

  • 83uV/uA (0dB)
  • 133uV/uA (+4dB) - EDIT: my unit actually shipped with this level pre-selected, not +6. The internal switches are tiny and very confusing!
  • 166uV/uA (+6dB)
  • 332uV/uA (+12dB)

Those +db number are not "absolute gain" values. They’re gain relative to the (0dB) base level’s 83uV/uA sensitivity (read that as: 83 micro-volts output for every 1 micro-ampere input). The actual gain must be calculated against the actual current generated by a given cartridge. So how to do THAT? I can guess to start with the basic kiddie equation:

V = I * R

And let’s start with a "typical" MC example: Koetsu Platinum (any stone) at 300uV output for 5ohm DC coils (for simplicity, we’ll ignore the inductive component of impedance). Then:

300uV = I * (5ohms + Rp)

Where Rp is the input resistance of the Piccolo Zero. It "should" be close to 0, but I can’t find Hagerman’s specification. Perhaps 1 ohm or less? This value becomes more important for ultra-low impedance coils (e.g. My Sonic Labs cartridges, Benz Ebony TR, some vintage Ortofon MC’s). For now we’ll conveniently ignore it and assume 0 ohms :)

300uV = I * (5ohms + 0) => I = 60uA

So 5 ohm coils gives us 60 micro-amperes. Note that the generated current is always going to be inversely proportional to the coil ohms (plus the input resistance we ignored)! Also note that we can simply multiply this current value against each gain level’s listed sensitivity. So for the 83uV/uA (0dB) level, we get:

83uV/uA*60uA = 4,980uV ~= 5mV

Wow! That’s right on the money for what signal level you want hitting the MM phono stage. We can also easily calculate the traditional voltage gain of this transformation:

4980uV / 300uV = 16.6x (step-up ratio) = 24.4dB

And it follows that the 166uV/uA (+6dB) level yields:

166uV/uA*60uA = 9,960uV ~= 10mV
4980uV / 300uV = 33x (step-up ratio) = 30.4dB

It’s interesting to note that the highest 332V/uA (+12dB) level yields a whopping 66x step-up ratio for 36.4dB of gain! It seems you can very easily push into some MASSIVE voltage gains, given a cartridge with ultra-low impedance coils. In those scenarios, one must exercise caution to not overload a downstream MM stage.

Furthermore, the above calculation can be generalized quite simply:

Voltage gain (ratio) = Sp(uV/uA) * (Vc / Rc(ohms)) / Vc = Sp(uV/uA) / Rc(ohms)

Where Sp is the sensitivity of a given gain level, Vc is the rated output voltage of a cartridge, Rc is the DC ohms of the cartridge coils. The cartridge output voltage cancels itself, and we’re left with:

Voltage gain (ratio) = Sp(uV/uA) / Rc(ohms)

So basically, we just take a given cartridge’s DC ohms and divide it into a sensitivity for a given gain level. That’s our net voltage gain ratio. Super easy :)

For clarity, here’s the full lineup of gain levels for our Koetsu Platinum:

  • 0db level => 83 / 5 = 17x step-up ratio = 24dB gain
  • +4dB level => 27x = 28dB gain
  • +6dB level => 33x = 30dB gain
  • +12dB level => 66x = 36dB gain

Clearly, one should stick to the 0dB or +4dB levels on a Koetsu. I can verify the +4dB level with Blue Lace sounds awesome :)

Now let’s look at the Van den Hul Crimson XGW Stradivarius, with 0.65mV from 12 ohm coils:

  • 0db level => 83 / 12 = 7x step-up ratio = 17dB gain
  • +4dB level => 11x = 21dB gain
  • +6dB level => 14x = 23dB gain
  • +12dB level => 28x = 29dB gain

That works out pretty well! I’ve also tried out this combo, and it sounds awesome. These numbers roughly gel with what I’m hearing versus a SUT. The +4dB level also works very nicely here, perhaps helped by the fact this VdH’s output seems weaker than its rating, relative to other brand cartridges rated 0.4mV - 0.8mV.

Now let’s look at the Van den Hul Colibri XGW Stradivarius, with 0.38mV from 36 ohm coils (we lose much output from the monopole design):

  • 0db level => 83 / 36 = 2.3x step-up ratio = 7dB gain
  • +4dB level => 3.7x = 11dB gain
  • +6dB level => 4.6x = 13dB gain
  • +12dB level => 9x = 19dB gain

At this point, we’re clearly struggling to achieve enough gain from those 36 ohm coils. However, the +12dB level should still be sufficient. I listened to this briefly, and indeed found its output level to be significantly lower than that of a 15x - 30x SUT. However I do not favor this combination yet - I’ll have to give it another shot later. The SUT or voltage mode approaches may have the clear advantage here, due to 36 ohm coils. EDIT: I had the internal gain level switch positions confused. They are very tiny and confusing! I was initially hearing the Colibri at 0dB level when I thought it was +12dB lol no wonder it sucked. I'll try the real +12dB shortly.

And finally, let’s look at a My Sonic Labs cartridge. I dunno, Eminent Ex? This cartridge wasn’t my jam (*I no longer have it on hand for testing here), but serves as a good example of an MSL configuration. 0.4mV from 0.9 ohm coils:

  • 0db level => 92x step-up ratio = 39dB gain

That’s crazy. And it only gets more ludicrous above that. So clearly the head amp’s input impedance is important at this point. If we assume 1 ohm, this drops to an almost reasonable 44x step-up ratio. Still way too much for 0.4mV, but it would be serviceable. Anyways, that begs the question: are My Sonic Labs cartridges "too much" for a transimpedance stage? Does such a head amp need special accommodation for these cartridges (i.e. a much lower gain level for MSL)? The Benz Ebony TR and vintage Ortofons (e.g. MC20, MC2000) don’t face this problem, because their output levels are lower in proportion with their coils.

** I’ve used the Piccolo Zero with two fairly high-end standalone phono stages, so far: VAC Renaissance SE and Hagerman Trumpet Reference. Both have a tube-based MM stage (6x 12AX7 in the VAC and 4x 12AX7 plus 4x 12AU7 in the Trumpet), and I’m bypassing their own internal MC stages. Results with both have been equally exceptional.

** Please note I’m not posing the above as any kind of authoritative analysis. This is just me, an analog hobbyist, trying to get a better handle on this product. Please help improve my understanding if you have corrections or insights to share!

mulveling

@rauliruegas My apologies. I thought you were saying cartridge is not pumping out current when used with transimpedance stage. 

Curious if anyone has insight into the differences, if there are any, in technology (or sound character) between the Piccolo Zero and the Sutherland SUTZ? They seem like basically the same thing yet the Piccolo Zero is so much more accessible and space-friendly.

After all the rave reviews, I’m still considering switching to the transimpedance headamp approach with a Piccolo Zero (or maybe even a Sutherland SUTZ) - coming from an SUT, a Quadratic MC-1, which I find very good, and low impedances cartridges (6-10 ohm) - dynavector, hana umami, etc.

Interested in recent thoughts from anyone who has made a similar comparison

(@mulveling - given your extensive experience with the MC-1, any comments on the two units would be especially useful.)

I did it but not with a Piccolo. I did it with a BMC MCCI and my aural results are to be found near the top of this thread. (1) where the cartridge has a very low internal resistance, it does make significant current output and is very good for driving a transimpedance stage. So there is a definite advantage with gain for cartridges that have a very tiny voltage output AND a very low internal R. (2) listening results are not always predictable. In other words, if you think you "know" the sound of a particular cartridge, that sound may vary surprisingly when driving a transimpedance phono stage. This can be good or disappointing. My guess is that this is because the stage has some very low input impedance greater than zero, and each cartridge will drive that stage differently depending upon ITS internal impedance. (Ideally, a TI phono stage should have zero input impedcance.)

So you have to try it to see if you like it. Ultimately I sold my BMC and went back to voltage drive.

A cool experiment would be to get hold of both versions of the Piccolo, since there is an older voltage drive version and compare them. So far as I know, the TI version may be nothing more than a current to voltage converter at the front end followed by the very same circuit downstream that adds gain in the voltage domain.

(@mulveling - given your extensive experience with the MC-1, any comments on the two units would be especially useful.)

@jobeare I still really like my Zero a lot - just listened to it last night, actually. It gives you a whole lot of the weight, passion, and tonal density of a good SUT. It’s definitely a more hit-or-miss match with cartridges than SUT or FET based MC stages. I’ve found very good results with Koetsu (Blue Lace), and really good results with traditional SPUs.

SPU Classic GM spherical has a particularly synergistic match with Zero. LOTS of "musical energy", and such a fun sound in this combo. Plenty of output signal level with the 2nd highest gain setting of the Zero. This level would be roughly comparable to a 30x SUT on a 0.3mV Koetsu. The Meister Silver is also a great match to Zero. But I’m sort of in awe of how great the Zero + SPU => $270 + $1100 combo sounds! Very fun and engaging sound.

The Quadratic SUT is a good one, but it’s definitely a little tilted in favor of bass frequencies, and a little relaxed / recessed up top. Just depends on your setup, how well that works. I spoke with the MC-1’s designer once, and he advised lifting VTA slightly to counteract this. The Zero sounds like a rather "neutral" SUT, but with most of the weight and fullness you’d typically associated with the latter. Think the Quadratic will still give more powerful bass, in most cases. Zero is also a little noisier than you’d get with a good SUT setup or a really quiet voltage mode MC stage (like Pass Labs) - that’s the "cost" with these otherwise fantastic sounding cheap and cheerful Hagerman MC stages. Is it enough noise to bother me? Nope. Doesn’t matter once the music starts.

If talking Hana Umami, the Red seems a little more electrically suited to Zero, due to its stronger magnet. I haven’t tried them yet, and can’t extrapolate beyond that. Even the Red is a little bit off of a Koetsu in its magnetic "efficiency" for this approach. But it’s close enough it could still be good.

A cool experiment would be to get hold of both versions of the Piccolo, since there is an older voltage drive version and compare them. So far as I know, the TI version may be nothing more than a current to voltage converter at the front end followed by the very same circuit downstream that adds gain in the voltage domain.

No, it’s just the Zero’s opamp doing the TI "magic". Nothing in common with the voltage-mode Piccolo (which is discrete JFET transistors, you can see the 4 metal cans), from what I can tell. I’ve had a few different voltage mode Piccolos, including the one built into Trumpet Reference. They also sound very good, but less like a SUT.