@gano , I do not know why I was drawn into The Brutalist . . . but I was. (I was surprised that AI told me that it was not based on fact, thanks for clearing that up.) As far as DeNiro goes, I think he has gotten better with age, and I’d say the same for Pacino. I forgot about Glengarry Glen Ross, yes, a great movie, but Heat? A typical good guys/bad guys bang bang shoot ’em up that although I have been told was based on fact, came off as totally and completely unrealistic to me. Good special effects and cinematography though. I’ve watched it once completely start to finish, but have not ever been able to get through another complete viewing.
I like that he is very consistent, no weird embarrassing roles like De Niro would do.
How about Dick Tracy?
As far as Detachment, what I didn’t say about that was that it had too many unrealistic depictions of events in it to be what I would consider a real good movie, but since I was on a Adrien Brody kick at the time, I threw it in there. Not a great movie, but an okay watch.
I thought that Lions For Lambs was pretty good. It had three rotating parallel stories going on simultaneously and a shorter flashback story. Set in the period a few years after 9/11 while the subsequent middle east invasions/wars were happening, Robert Redford plays a professor in one of the stories giving counsel to a privileged and intelligent but lackadaisical student. At the same time, in another story. Meryl Streep plays a journalist interviewing a GOP senator with a neocon world view played by Tom Cruise. I enjoy Tom Cruise when he is out of his usual type cast roles. In the other simultaneous story, two students (Michael Pena and Adrian Finch) that Redford had in his class prior are in Chinook helicopter over Afghanistan. The brief flash back story shows the two students when they were in Redford’s class back before they joined the military and there is the contrast to be made. Redford’s acting was strong in this movie.