Graham Phamtom III Reference tonearm


Hi, anyone using a Graham Phamtom III Reference tonearm? Any thoughts about it? Thanks!

portoalegre

A bit unusual to call the III a "reference" tonearm, since it coincided with the release of the Graham Phantom Elite - which remains their defacto reference tonearm. 

Anyways, I owned its immediate predecessor - the Phantom II Supreme (a.k.a. Phantom 2.5). It was a very, very nice tonearm.

Pros:

  • Sounds very good & works well with anything. Very good at running Koetsus (you don’t need more mass). 
  • Refined, smooth and nuanced sound without sounding "over-damped". Doesn’t emphasize any part of the spectrum, unlike most other arms (e.g. VPI 3D arms empahsize bass, FR64S adds sparkle to treble). 
  • Setup & use is a dream; settings are easily repeatable
  • Handles for the most part like a nice smooth & stable gimbal pivoted arm.
  • Exchangeable wands are nice, IF you can get the spare wands (of the same length).

Cons:

  • Not as "vivid" a sound as a Fidelity Research FR64S - but you could certainly call that a coloration of the 64S (but I like it)!
  • It can have difficulty keeping a brand new Colibri in the groove, but so does ANYTHING - those things are a goddamn nightmare when new. 
  • The anti-skate mechanism is weird. I don’t feel like it worked properly. Maybe it was just my unit. I don’t care much about anti-skate, anyways
  • As with most unipivots, a hard stop in the vertical travels kicks in sooner than with gimbals. You just have to get used to this when cueing. 
  • Support from Graham is spotty at best. He still uses an old email server that predates World War 1.  
  • Spare parts are not always available and can take a LONG time to retock. 
  • The 3 length wands: 9"’ 10" and 12" is confusing and makes it harder to source spare wands. I used 10" and like it, except when a used 9" or 12" wand came up for sale. 
  • Spare wands cost a lot more than the headshells of other arms.
  • You expect a new Phantom arm to ship with a manual (important for setup)? Haha, no way. People still email me for a PDF copy (to my knowledge, it’s still the same as the old B44 manual).

Don’t read too much into the cons list being long - I’m just being thorough. Overall I really like the arm, and it’s a big positive. I kind of miss it now (sold it a couple years back).

 

I am still looking for a copy of the old B44 manual.  Is it online anywhere?

Thanks for your nice comments. I will be using with a Transrotor ZET-3 TT and a Hana Umami Red cartridge.

The dealer offered me as a Graham Phamtom III Reference tonearm ...

And I don't like analytical sound, I prefer more musical, "colored" sound.

I have the Phantom III Elite. I use it with Soundsmith Hyperion I. 
Before this tonearm I had a great soundstage with all the notes clear and precise. What I hear now is the body of the instruments or the singer. Everything is more 3 dimensional. The realism is amazing. I don’t think it’s analytical but very musical. My digital doesn’t sound like this. 
My arm came with the cable internal to the phono preamp. 
I think it’s the easiest tonearm to setup with jigs for alignment. 
Phil