regular interconnect for digital signal transfer

In general I would not recommend it.

It may function, but unless the cable is specifically designed to have a 110 ohm "characteristic impedance," or it is explicitly indicated as being suitable for carrying AES/EBU digital signals, chances are that sonics will be seriously degraded due to jitter problems, waveform distortion, and other effects of impedance mismatches (more so or less so depending on the jitter rejection capabilities and other characteristics of the DAC).

Some "standard" balanced interconnects are designed in just that manner, though. An example is the inexpensive Blue Jeans/Belden 1800F cable.

Also, I would suggest that you obtain a cable that is approximately 1.5 meters in length (unless a very short length, such as 6 to 12 inches, would be adequate for your purposes). See this paper.

Regards,
-- Al

I have tried many, including 1.5M ones. Some were designed for digital, some standard ICs. I previously used a 1.5M Transparent Reference, which is considered one of the best on the market and costs roughly $1500. I am now using a VDH The First Ultimate which is a better match for my system. This has also been the experience of HIFICRITIC, which often used standard ICs, including the one I use. I suggest you try it yourself as you probably have spare ICs around. For me the 1M VDH sounds considerably better than my 1.5M Apogee Wydeye which is suppose to be very good. Also HIFICRITIC does very detailed jitter tests and they have not found problems with standard ICs or extra performance in the 1.5M length. EVERY cable I or my friends have tried on a variety of systems sounds different, we tested 8 one afternoon; I have not tried balanced in on CD; my old line stage didn't have balanced in, my new one does but I am happy with SE so far. If you have a balanced cable or can get one on approval I think it is worth a try.

Stanwal, the Apogee Wyde Eye is a budget-class hot pick, it's nowhere in the same league as some of the more expensive cables. I don't believe I've heard the Transparent Reference (and I don't believe I'd ever pay that much for a digital interconnect) but I can vouch for the Zu Ash, the Atlas Opus, the Ven Haus Cryo Pulsar and the Auricle "Encore" Signature as all being both more expensive and better-sounding than the Wyde Eye.

The 1.5 meter length, if it works with your gear, removes a signal transmission problem and results in more defined and coherent sound. I have never heard a system in which the extra length didn't make a nice difference, but in theory a proper control of impedance matching between transport, connections and DAC could have the same result at shorter lengths.

I gave the Wyde Eye as an example of a "correct" design that is also recommended by Stereophile. What I was trying to say is that there are other factors involved in the sound of ICs that are not easily measured, I would never argue theory with Al. I bought my Transparent used so I didn't pay $1500 either; there are so many on the market that I have heard only a fraction of them and none of those you mention. And at todays prices buying a one meter and a one and a half to compare is quite expensive. Mine have been either one or the other; the VDH digital cable [ not the First Ultimate] does not even come in 1.5. I have also found silver and copper to sound different [Duh!].