2. digital
  3. 1348069476

Any other AQ Dragonfly Early Adopters out there?

I'd been seeing the AudioQuest Dragonfly USB DAC ads for a month or so and was intrigued. Then it was the cover story for the Oct. issue of Stereophile. Once I read that it:

o Is the size of a thumb drive
o Decodes anything up to 24/96
o Has asynchronous USB decoding
o Was designed by Gordon Rankin himself
o Has no measurable jitter
o Presents a nice balance of tonal body plus detail and treble extension
o Is priced under $250

... I ran out and bought one at my local Magnolia AV. Man, this thing is *cool*! I have been listening almost exclusively to vinyl, and although I've ripped about 250 CDs to my laptop in Apple Lossless format, I still didn't use it for playback much, convenient as it was, because the music ranged from uninvolving to actively irritating.

With the Dragonfly in the signal chain, this is no longer the case. This is a simple and inexpensive way to turn your computer into an excellent-sounding enjoyable source of music. When I play it for background music, it is very relaxing; when I put on more engaging music and turn it up, it is fully enjoyable and involving.

One thing I discovered along the way, however: Since a USB-powered device has to run on a tiny amount of voltage coming through the USB port, there is not a lot of latitude for getting the best performance. My laptop only has two USB ports and one is used for the portable disk drive that holds all my music files. I had been using the other USB port for an external keyboard and plugged the Dragonfly into one of the keyboard's extension USB ports. Using it this way, however, the music coming through the Dragonfly sounded like typical computer-based digital music--there was an irritating glare that made my shoulders go up and forehead tighten. But when I unplugged the keyboard and plugged the Dragonfly directly into the computer's USB port, everything turned into sweetness and light. This is a sweet-sounding rig.

And I've yet to hear it at its best. The Dragonfly can decode up to 24/96. As soon as I install some playback software by Songbird or Decibel, I'm going to download a 24/96 album or two from HDTracks and see how far I can take this. I've heard computer-based 24/96 and 24/88.2 files in demos, and they are significantly smoother and more natural than redbook files.

If you have $250 and would like to elevate the listenability of your computer-based music files, the Dragonfly will get you there. Just a few years ago someone posted on this forum how his laptop and a Wavelength Cosecant was his new digital playback standard. OK, so the Dragonfly is no Cosecant, but it's not $3500-6000 either, and it's still a Gordon Rankin design that provides completely jitter-free playback.
johnnyb53
philjolet's avatar
philjolet
2,306 posts
 
Stereophile raved about it too

I wonder how it compares to my MusicStreamer II which I really enjoy and think is a terrific bargain at $150.00.
jndean
132 posts
 
I did not buy the Dragonfly, but did buy the Halide DAC HD which is also small and portable. It is more expensive but already has all wires to connect to USB and to an amp. It is $ 499. It sounds wonderful and via wav easily sounds as good as CDs. It is my first DAC, however. Both the Dragonfly and the Halide were recently favorably reviewed in Stereophile by John Atkinson and Art Dudley. John Atkinson said the Halide was now his go to DAC. Choices.
johnnyb53 OP
3,510 posts
 
The Halide was reviewed in the September issue of S'phile; the Dragonfly in October. Both showed up in October's Recommended components, the Halide is Class A and Dragonfly is Class B, which is still good company for a $250 DAC.

I thought about the Halide; the idea of a class A asynchronous USB DAC is attractive, but I like the Dragonfly's form factor and I/O's better. I like the DF's stereo miniplug for the versatility to use it with headphones or to plug into the stereo. I already have some high quality stereo mini-to-RCA cables for plugging into the stereo.

Also, I'm thinking of getting PureMusic's plug-in so I can do HDTracks. Since I'm archiving my music to a USB hard drive, I'm particularly attracted to PureMusic's ability to specify buffering an album in RAM before playing it. That should eliminate any sonic downside to archiving via USB. Alternatively, with my new MacBook, I could get an external drive with Thunderbolt interface, which has 20x the data transfer rate of USB 2.0.
tmsorosk
1,013 posts
 
Interesting thread, thanks. And thanks to the other posters for there input.
johnnyb53 OP
3,510 posts
 

09-20-12: Peter_s
Great if you can use your internal disk instead of external. The Dragonfly manual recommends using a different Bus if you are going to attach an external HD. Specifically, use a firewire for your HD and USB for your DAC.

My MacBook Pro has a Thunderbolt interface, 20x the speed of USB 2.0. If I upgrade the external drive that's what I'll get. In the meantime, I downloaded Audirvana to run my music files, and it appears to be a great matchup for the Dragonfly's capabilities and USB drive's limitations.

Audirvana enables you to create a multi-gigabyte cache in RAM for buffering music files. So now the speed and traffic on the USB bus is less of an issue--the music is streaming directly from RAM. I was contemplating paying $189 to get this in Amarra, but Audirvana offers it in Audirvana Plus at $50.

It provides a selection of upsampling schemes, overriding iTunes' up sampling everything to 24/96. I changed everything to 2x oversampling, so all my 44.1Khz ALAC files are now upsampled to 88.2Khz. The Dragonfly's color indicator changed from magenta (96KHz) to amber (88.2Khz) indicating that it's working, and I noticed a welcome improvement in the treble--smoother and more relaxed. I noticed better bass extension and fullness with Audirvana as well.
More to discover