Has CD playback evolved in the last 5 years?


A recent thread asked if an older, inexpensive player should be repaired or replaced; and that has me asking the question - has cd playback technology evolved to the point where it's now prudent to replace older (say 5 years or more) players because of advancements in technology? I have an older Arcam FMJ 23 that sounds really nice, but I'm wondering if new players or DACs will give me better sonics than my Arcam. (I live in an area where I can't audition equipment very easily)
rockyboy
Probably the biggest evolution in CD players is the use of CDROM drives and buffering the data before spooling it out to reduce jitter. Similar to the way Computer Audio works.

The biggest evolution in digital audio is elimination of the optical disk completely. Better retention of the music data on hard disk, and better SQ is possible in the playback due to lower jitter.

Jitter is the #1 problem with digital audio and there have been great advances in the last 5 years to minimize this. It can never be zero, regardless of what the marketing BS says.

The next major milestone is to properly characterize jitter and its audiblity.

Steve N.
Empirical Audio
"Probably the biggest evolution in CD players is the use of CDROM drives and buffering the data before spooling it out to reduce jitter. "

Steve, can u name a few CDPs using this technology?
thanks.
Edorr, the Playback and the Ayon (used as a pre primarily) is in the study. The speakers are Lenehan ML2 Reference with a Plinius SA-Reference.

The EMM Labs XDS1 is in the main media room with an ARC Reference 5SE to Nemos driving Thiel CS3.7s. I also run two SS2.2 subs.
Nice. Not many would spend nearly 2x on their source as their speakers, but I have heard the Thiels and they are phenomenal, provided you have a moderate size room.