Strange Tonearm Tweak. Long


As you all know, I am a little different. I like to read and study stuff like tonearm technology. I noticed that some of the better unipivot designs have employed "outrigger" style outboard weighting systems on their arms, that work like a tightrope-walker's balance pole. This not only balances azimuth, but also gives the arm better stability to lateral deflections from the cartridge suspension, so the arm is not moved when the stylus is pushed laterally by the groove information. I began to think on this, and I wondered why no gimbal-bearing arm makers are doing this. Surely since the vertical plane rides on a vertical axis bearing, there is still some chance for the arm to be laterally deflected by the stylus, when the stylus should be doing all of the moving, not the arm. I think that this is why they use heavy arms, but a heavy arm in the vertical movement plane is not good for tracking. A heavy arm in the horizontal movement plane is good for resisting sideways deflection that would impair pickup function.

So I decided to try increasing the mass of my tonearm in the lateral plane, while keeping it light in the vertical plane, by the use of "outrigger" weights, just like a unipivot does.

I bought lead fishing weights that looked like long rifle bullets(just the lead part) They were about an inch long and about 3/8" diameter, and weighed 12 grams each. I drilled into the bases about 1/4" and press-fitted them onto the nuts that hold the arm into the bearing yoke, so they stuck out straight sideways, like sideways spikes. This put the weight out pretty far to the sides as outriggers, and kept the weight centered exactly around the bearing pivot axis so it did not increase the vertical mass significantly, but it did very slightly. It did not influence the tracking force at all.

So now the arm had outrigger stabilizers on it in the horizontal plane of motion.

I put on a record and sat down to listen. Let me tell you, fellas, this was a mind blower. I have never heard this much information come out of a cartridge before. I heard sounds on records that I had listened to for 30 years, and never knew those sounds were on the record! And I have had some pretty good analog gear in my time. And what I didn't own, I heard at the audio store I worked at. This is the most astounding mod I have ever heard on a tonearm. And it cost me $1.49 for the fishing weights, and I got 3 extras.

The only slightly negative thing about it, is that it increases the anti-skating force, so you have to cut that back a little, and if you have some marginal scratches that might skip, they are more likely to skip with this mod, due to the resistance to sideways movement provided by the outriggers. I had this happen once last night, but I didn't consider it a problem.

But the increase in dynamics, and detail and overall sound quality is astronomical. It blew me away.

I have a DL103, which is a very stiff cartridge, and it may be that this is not needed for a higher compliance cart. But, I think that it would be good for anything that is medium or lower in compliance.

The key to it, is that it only increases the resistance to sideways movement, without interfering with the effective mass of the arm, or the vertical swing movement that needs to stay light to track warps. I played some warped records with this mod, and they played just as well as without the mod, except they sounded better.

I have a pretty good analog setup now, but I can say without reservation, that this mod made my rig sound better than any analog rig that I have ever heard in my life. I have never heard a Rockport.

Stabilizing the arm against unwanted lateral deflection increases the information retrieval and dynamics by a very large percentage. If your arm is not set up like a Rega style arm, then you can glue a 1 ounce long rod across the top of the bearing housing(sideways) like a tightrope-walker's balance pole. Use lead if you can, it won't ring. You don't have to do any permanent changes to your arm that might wreck its resale value to try this out. If it has anywhere near the effect on your system as it had on mine, you won't be taking it off.

It may come close to the movement of your cueing lever, so make sure you have clearance to use it. Mine was close, and I have to come in from the side now to use the lever, at the end of a record. That is fine with me! This was a major, major improvement in the sound of my rig. It is staying permanently. As in "forever".

If you are a little tweak-oriented, and not afraid to do stuff like this. You should try it. It will knock you over.
twl
Hi Basement - Your explanation seems to make good sense for a moment, but then it occurs to me: In the case of the balanced lever on a pivot, gravity is working on its mass throughout its length and in equal proportion to the distribution of that mass, while in the case of the 'sideways' tonearm situation, the skating force (unlike gravity) is always being applied unequally only at the point which the stylus touches the spinning vinyl, no matter how the mass is distributed. Is this really analogous?

Shirasagi: You could make a more obvious demonstration by employing the smooth uncut track featured on some test records (older ones anyway) for adjusting anti-skate. The net effect of unequal side-weighting on skating - provided it is present - would be much more readily observable this way than by trying to eyeball the tough-to-see (and impossible to visually quantify with precision) stylus deflection differences.
Yes, I should not have actually said, "shifts the forces", I should say shifts the relationship of the forces. It gives the various different forces a different relationship (equation) as they relate to each other.
You are correct- if we hang a tonearm straight down, and get gravity to pull it to one side, and put it on the table again, there is no longer any gravity pulling it sideways. It would not have force to pull it to one side. In actuality, the force of the cartridge on the pivot point does not change either (unless we increase the tracking force).
If we visualize a tonearm hanging straight down with a radically offset mass, you can see that it would take a certain amount of pressure to hold it to hang straight down. And the offset weight is resisting gravity. Replace the gravity in this visualation with the pull of the cartridge. It takes more effort to pull the cartridge one way than the other.
While radically shifting the weight in this manner will not actually pull the cartridge in a direction, it will alter the resistance to such a pull. This then also changes the effect of the pull on other forces. The cartridge will pull to one side more than the other, not because there is more pull in one direction, but because there is more resistance in the other.
This can lead to some pretty deep thoughts on anti-skate. While it is the offset angle of the cartridge is what pulls the arm to one side, the pull is actually directly in line with the cantilever. But, we do see that the cantilever deflecting to one side (when we can see it). To use offset mass as opposed to actually applying an offset counterforce, might be a more effective, and accurate way to deal with anti-skate.
A quick note. I've used the offset HI-FI tweak for months now, since last fall, and have not the slightest doubt that it is effective. Regarding being able to see the cantilever I can't force anyone to agree with this, of course, but I've got a Denon DL-103D cart (with tag reading 1978) that has a fairly easy-to-see cantilever, and my table is placed just in front of a window which, with shade open, allows brilliant natural light to flood in. Anyone - I repeat, anyone - who doesn't have a fairly serious vision problem would be able to see the movement of this cantilever as it varies according to setup. Thanks, folks.
Thank you for sharing this, I tried it and am utterly delighted and awestruck! I had been quite happy with my fully Expressimo-modded RB250, but noticed that cymbals were not pronounced enough for my pleasure, I had been tweaking with mats and thought I had it solved, but then it backed up and I was at square one. I had acquired some of these bullet weights to see about spikes for my gear, they didn't work, but then brought them out for this suggestion and am very impressed!
Tw1,
for some reason or another I never discover this thread. Just to add something to the discussion I would like to mention the following: I opened a discussion at Vinyl Engine which concerns the theoretic background of effective weight in the lateral and vertical direction. Some links to texts written by the famous air arm inventor Poul Laadegaard heve been added. The thread is called:How important is arm resonance frequency? Can it improve sound quality? You can find it at page 4 of the Turntable Talk part of the forum overthere.

Perhaps you know of the existance of another theoretic paper on this subject? A site by Van Alstine on the web published a similar mod mounted on the cartridge, but I think that one is not good for tracking. the thread at Vinyl Engine leads us to a last open question: how does Mr Laadegaard himself think about the 1977 AES paper at the moment? Unfortunately he is very silent about this. He did not answer my email to the B&K- office in Denmark.
Jan