TriPlanar Tips


The manual that comes with the TriPlanar Mk VII tonearm is fairly complete, but there are a few things I’ve learned only by living with the arm. Note: I do not know which if any of these would apply to previous versions of the arm. My only experience is with the Mk VII.

1. NEVER raise the cueing lever while the arm is locked in the arm rest. This pressures the damping cylinder and could cause a silicone leak. For this reason and also for safety, whenever the arm is in the arm rest the cueing lever should be DOWN. This is backwards from most arms and takes some getting used to.

2. If your Tri-Planar doesn't cue straight down there's a quick fix, which may be included on some new arms. The problem is insufficient friction between the arm tube and the hard rubber cueing support bar. Just glue a bit of thin sandpaper to the underside of the arm tube. Make it big enough and position it so it hits the cueing support bar at all points across the arm’s arc. (Note: after doing this you will need to adjust the cueing height, see Tip #3.)

3. When adjusting cueing height (instructions are in the manual) always do so with the arm in the UP position. This adjustment is VERY touchy, since the cueing support bar is so close to the pivot. Be patient and be careful of your cartridge. (Note: after doing this you may need to adjust the anti-skate initiation point, see Tip #4.)

Chris Brady of Teres told me of a way to improve cueing even more by re-shaping the cueing support. Moving the cueing support point farther from the pivot improves its mechanical advantage and makes the cueing height and speed adjustments less touchy. This mod is easier than it sounds and requires only a length of coat hanger (!), but I don’t have pix and haven’t yet done it myself.

4. Changing the cueing height affects the point where anti-skate kicks in. (Yes, it's weird.) Once cueing height is satisfactory, adjust the short pin that sticks out of the front of the cueing frame. That pin controls where the anti-skate dogleg first engages the knot on the string.

5. The Tri-Planar comes with three counterweight donuts of differing masses. Many cartridges can be balanced using either of two. The arm usually tracks best with the heaviest donut that will work, mounted closer to the pivot. Of course this also reduces effective mass, which may or may not be sonically desirable depending on the cartridge. It also leaves more room for Tip #6.

6. For fine VTF adjustments don’t futz with the counterweight, there’s an easier way. Set the counterweight for the highest VTF you think you’ll need (ie, close to the pivot). Pick up some 1/4" I.D. O-rings from Home Depot. To reduce VTF a bit just slip an O-ring or two on the end stub. Thin O-rings reduce VTF by .01-.02g, thick ones by .04-.05g. Quick, cheap, effective. (For safety, always lock the arm down while adding or removing O-rings.)

7. When adjusting VTA, always bring the pointer to the setting you want by turning it counter-clockwise at least ¼ of a turn. This brings the arm UP to the spot you've selected, which takes up the slop in the threads. You can easily feel this happening.

Hope someone finds these useful. If you know any more, please bring ‘em on!
dougdeacon
Hi JB0194,

While the example I gave was for power amplifiers, the same does indeed hold true for any conventional (non-digital) power supply design.

Since my turntables are batterey driven, I haven't had to chase down power supply filter issues. I'm sorry that I can't point you toward a theoretically optimum number.

Cheers,
Thom @ Galibier
Paperw8 ,

Since it takes so little time (less than the duration of a cut on an LP), remove the trough and try a practical observation. It's pretty simple to do. It certainly takes less time than the posting that has been done.

Who knows? Your Lyra and TriPlanar 'may' respond favorably. If not in your particular case, put it back and call it a day. This seems like a logical solution for all..

Dre

Since it takes so little time (less than the duration of a cut on an LP), remove the trough and try a practical observation. It's pretty simple to do.
The trough is attached to an arm. The arm attaches to the tonearm by a screw that is not accessible from above. Whether it is easy to remove depends on the armboard. For some turntables, the removal is easy, for others not so. I'm in the latter category. I would have to remove the tonearm from the armboard to access the screw. But, yeah, if it's easy to remove, then it's probably worth a try on a "what the heck" basis.
"Since it takes so little time (less than the duration of a cut on an LP), remove the trough and try a practical observation. It's pretty simple to do. It certainly takes less time than the posting that has been done."

Oh no, it seem to go against his principle. :D

Look, there are millions of things in audio that can not be logically and thoroughly explained, and we are all doing our part to find out more each day(thus the internet forums). For someone who "claimed" he does not have he time to tinker with audio and is seeking for quick answers, sure has plenty of time posting to crack sculls.
Paperw8, while you're experimenting with removing the trough, here is something for you to ponder about. The equation you cited for estimating the resonant frequency of the system formed by the arm/cart is just that. An estimate. Real measurements of a given arm/cart often give different results. This equation should be taken as nothing more than a sanity check of the particular arm/cart pairing being considered. If the numbers are close you are probably ok but nothing more. If the numbers are off you need to find another combination.

You are on the right track with this tonearm resonance issue. It is very much a result of the amount of energy a cart is allowed to impart back into the arm. This is not only a function of the compliance, but also the damping of the cartridge itself. Some cartridges are notorious for transferring relatively significant amounts of energy into the arm. At that point it becomes the problem of the arm designer to deal with these vibrations. Again, we're talking about the small (small to us, but potentially devastating to our delicate arm/cart system) amount of energy generated in the cantilever and cartridge body. I hope from this that you can see why tapping is akin to driving an amp into saturation. It really doesn't say much at all about what happens during normal playback.

I have no formal arts training either, but do have degrees in EE and CS, so maybe we can find a common line of reasoning.