How to set SRA after determining true vertical?


Here is a picture of a stylus with zero rake angle:

http://members.cox.net/nsgarch/SRA@%200.0%20deg.jpg

Since all modern styli are symmetrical in the x and y plane about the verical z axis, the tapered stylus and its reflection will make a perfect "X" when vertical (z axis perpendicular to the groove) and viewed from the side.

This condition is established by raising or lowering the tonearm pivot post. Once you find this point, and assuming you have a typical 9" tonearm (about 230 mm from pivot to stylus) then each 4 mm you raise the post from the zero
SRA point will apply one degrewe of SRA to the stylus.

A test setup is shown in these two pics:

http://members.cox.net/nsgarch/SRA%20setup1.jpg
http://members.cox.net/nsgarch/SRA%20setup2.jpg

Equipment includes:

a mini Mag-Lite flashlite,
a first surface mirror from old SLR cameras -- easy to find at photo repair shop)
a 50X pocket microscope
bean bags

Don't forget to first remove antiskate and set VTF.

.
128x128nsgarch
SRA is irrelavent. It is the position of the stylus in the groove that counts. The maufacturer designed the cartrridge to achieve that with the arm parrallel to the record surface. To the extent you use different forces and angles you may have to raise or lower the arme to restablish that angle.
If you read Mr. vdH's notes (the Q and A part) on tonearm setup on his website, you'll run across a statement where he flatly recommends raising the back of the tonearm about 6 - 8 mm (from level, or from parallel to the platter), I think it says.

This is actually about right for his vdH cartridges which (most of the time, but not all!) are manufactured with the stylus perpendicular to the top of the cartridge body when the cantilever is deflected under normal VTF.

Following his instructions gives you 1.5 to 2 degrees SRA probably 80% of the time for vdH cartridges (though I still think it's best to check with a scope to make sure.) My point is, that even if you just rely on his recommendation and don't check first, you should still be close enough to the correct SRA to find it by ear without much further up or down adjustment.

Greg's assertion that all manufacturers mount their styli so they have proper SRA when the cartridge is parallel to the platter would be really nice if true, but unfortunately the variations are pretty wide. Even among the products of a single manufacturer. My guess its that it's a difficult parameter to control tightly in real-life production. Also there are three ways I know of for attaching the diamond to the cantilever, so most makers are probably thrilled just to get that pesky diamond stuck to that little boron rod!!

The one thing I've never seen (at least in my economically limited cartridge auditioning experience) is a cartridge which requires the tonearm post be lowered from level (as in "ass dragger") to achieve correct SRA. Anyone who thinks their setup sounds best this way really needs to do the investigation I described at the beginning of this thread. I'm not saying it couldn't happen (never say never) but if I were a tonearm designer, I'd be upset to see my tonearm used this way because it creates a less stable mechanical assembly (relative to gravity) as the vertical pivot center gets closer and closer to, or even lower than!, the stylus' position in the groove.
Gregadd,

SRA actually IS the position of the stylus in the groove. That's what Stylus Rake Angle means. I think we're both saying the same thing, just in different terms.

Dan,

You're right, our arm is low at the pivot. But that makes the cartridge level, at least on this rig. IME ZYX's like to be level.

I'd hadn't thought about it, but I suppose fiddling with the arm during play on a suspended table could be more exciting than you'd like. It's a non-issue on tables like these, as you saw. I can jump up and down and it won't skip, despite the suspended wood floor.

Paul developed his acute sensitivity to SRA soon after we got our first Teres/OL Silver/Shelter rig. On familiar records he can reliably tell me, "too high" or "too low" from the den, two rooms away. It's a bit nuts, but with exposure and an improving system I find my acuity increasing too. Once you start down that path...

BTW, Paul thinks all rock listeners are headbangers! He apparently grew up hoping the British invasion meant those hooligans were all leaving his native country for good. ;-) If I want the house to myself all I have to do is spin one of my (three) rock LP's. Of course for their own safety I do have to hide them.

Seriously, those shrugs were just us acknowledging that it's harder to hear arm height changes with rock than classical. Amplified instruments often become slightly bloated. Many tube guitar amps are tuned for a bit of roundness of course. That bloat masks the nano-timing cues of small SRA changes. Acoustic instruments with quick rise and decay times respond more audibly. Obviously that is both a blessing and a curse.

Thanks again for coming down. It was great getting together with you guys.
Doug's post reminded me that this word "level" is getting tossed around quite a lot. Just so it gets mentioned, the first thing to "level" is the platter. And if you have a suspended table, that means with a clamp and record in place on the platter. (Keep the tonearm in its rest, it won't make any significant difference to "level" in its rest as opposed to sitting on the middle track of the record!)

After that, the position of the tonearm relative to the platter (either parallel or nose-down) will be determined by setting it to provide the proper SRA for the stylus.
Whoops! I've said all this before. I keep getting sucked in. Any way vdh's advice sort of proves my point. Think about it. He also had to make the call. If the cantilever is sort of a spring it will deflect under different loads (vtf). Thus if the range is 1.5 -2.2 grams. Then in setting the SRA he had to pick the load producing his optimum sra for that load and arm geometry.

I "believe" that all your are doing is "relocating" that point based on your different load and arm geometry and not duplicating the original SRA of each record. Of course it changes from record to record because record thickness again alters the arm geometry.

Perhaps Doug is right and we are approaching the same solution from a different direction.