Schroeder vs. Triplanar VII Sonic Differences


All,

I have read a lot of threads regarding the "superiortiy" of these tonearms in the right combinations of tables and catridges. However, there doesn't seem to be a lot said about the soncic characteristics of each brand and the differences between them. I'm interested in hearing your thoughts about their strengths and weaknesses, sonci characteristics, applicability to various types of music (rock, pop, classical, large scale, small scale, etc).

Will a Schroeder deliver dynamics, punch, bass suited to Rock music? Will a Triplanar deliver natural, timbral accuracy? Are both these arms suited to the same music?

Thanks in advance,

Andrew
aoliviero
Thanks for the comments, Speedy.

In reply to Downunder's question, I lived with my Merrill Periphery Clamp for 9 years - beginning when in my mid-30's. More recently, I evaluated one made by Sound Engineering. Bob B. was very interested in becoming an OEM supplier for me.

The danger is real, and I would not put my stamp of approval on either of these products. When I speak of paying attention to cantilever health, I am referring to what I call "boundary conditions".

When you are wide awake and functioning at your best, you typically don't have accidents.

I would hope however that everyone reading this has had those magical listening experiences - late at night when you fall off into a trance.

It's when we are in those elusive states of consciousness that we should not have to shift back into 100% real-world consciousness in order to play the other side.

To my way of thinking, this hobby is all about space and time travel - to a magical place where the recording was made.

Shifting your mental state has the same (or worse) effect on the musical experience as does poor fidelity.

The last thing I want on my conscience is for someone to trash a Koetsu or ZYX because of a periphery clamp.

None of this is intended to discourage those who see no problem with its use. It does, however add another step to the act of playing a record. As I mentioned earlier, what one person calls ritual, another calls drudgery. This is an individual determination.

Cheers,
Thom @ Galibier
.
Thom,
.
Have you had any positive/negative experiences with using "Record Flattener's" on LP's. Are they worth the effort /cost ?
.
Thanks,
Larry
.
I have not, had the opportunity, Larry.

I assume you are talking about the ones which ramp up / down the temperature while pressing the records flat?

In theory, you'd effect an improvement with respect to warp-wow. In practice ?? It's something I'll get around to trying sooner or later.

Cheers,
Thom @ Galibier
I know a fellow hobbyist,actually a fanatical LP collector/audiophile,who was very doubtful as to the effectiveness of this.He has a "fabulous" collection of vinyl.Actually,probably one of the best LP collections available.He did spring for the disc flattener,in question,and is head over heels "crazy" about it.It does everything claimed,and does NO damage to any LP he's tried.He has some extremely rare,and expensive discs which, when flattened ,were "better than new",according to him.

Looks like a winner,but not cheap!
.
Sirspeedy,
.
How have you been ?
.
Did your buddy with the Record Flattener achieve better sonics with the records after being flattened ?
.
Rgds,
Larry
.