2. analog
  3. 1146742314

Anybody go from Thorens 125 II to VPI?

Unfortunately I have got hooked on vinyl after 15 years of only digital - now I can hardly listen to digital and have a TT in all 3 locations where I listen. I have a mint Thorens 125 II with TD 16 arm and Shure V15VMXR at work, where the music is on 12 hours a day - and a VPI TNT jr with JMW 10 arm and Sumiko Blackbird in my basement (both bought used, mint) - question is: How would a VPI Aries 2 Extended with JMW 12.5 arm (for sale on A'gon and E-bay) compare sonically with the Thorens? The threads on many Thorens' devotees' sites is so enamored of Thorens that I thought I would ask on this forum, which was so helpful in getting me re-started and now fully addicted to vinyl. Anybody have first hand experience of the VPI TNT jr and Aries 2 with 12.5 arm in comparison to a mint 125 II? For the record, my vinyl yardstick is the Sota Cosmos III (vacuum) with Shelter 901 and EAR 324, in my main system. See what you guys have done to me?:)
Thanks for your input.
springbok10
jaybo
4,478 posts
 
the comparisons to various vpi tables are subjective in many cases. i think unless you are going for that sota cosmos, you should sick with the mint 125 mkll
springbok10 OP
711 posts
 
Jaybo, that's just what I want to hear
perose
40 posts
 
I'd think with all the different spinners at your disposal you'd have a pretty good idea of the sonic finger print of the Thorens. I went from a TD-126MkII/TP-16(?)/V15VxMR to an SME-10/V15VxMR and the improvement was nothing short of amazing.

I donated my Thorens to the 9/11 charity auction and feel good about that but, I still have huge waves of nostalgia when I read about these great TTs. However, there is absolutly no way that I would give up the improvements that the SME-10 brought to the party. I had no idea vinyl could sound so good. The Thorens is good but, there are much better rigs out there and the state of the art has advanced since the 125 II.
More to discover