It makes good sense that wearing an excellent watch improves your hifi.
All of the tweaks I buy improve my hifi.
I realised long ago if you only bought a hifi tweak your wife agreed improved things youÂd miss out on just about all of them. LetÂs assume, for the sake of argument, you canÂt detect a 1% tweak improvement. It becomes essential to read very many reviews and use your judgement that a given tweak would pull on the same end of the rope as another tweak. Ten tweaks give a maximum improvement of 10% - and so IÂd hear it. Even with a couple of misjudgements, rope-wise, IÂd still get a 6% improvement which IÂd also hear. Note this is indistinguishable from ten tweaks averaging +0.6% each. Or nine tweaks averaging +0.7% and one error of -0.3%. IÂm not a mathematician but wouldnÂt be surprised to learn that gives at least factorial 10 divided by factorial 2 + factorial 10 divided by factorial 3 etc etc - permutations of tweaks. This is a big number and makes it pointless trying to eliminate rogue tweaks.
I hope this makes some sense. ItÂs a lengthy process typing one handed in the foetal position  especially when you canÂt see your watch.
IÂve looked up Solingen, thank you, but what I need are very fine clippers not scissors  ideally ones that float.
All of the tweaks I buy improve my hifi.
I realised long ago if you only bought a hifi tweak your wife agreed improved things youÂd miss out on just about all of them. LetÂs assume, for the sake of argument, you canÂt detect a 1% tweak improvement. It becomes essential to read very many reviews and use your judgement that a given tweak would pull on the same end of the rope as another tweak. Ten tweaks give a maximum improvement of 10% - and so IÂd hear it. Even with a couple of misjudgements, rope-wise, IÂd still get a 6% improvement which IÂd also hear. Note this is indistinguishable from ten tweaks averaging +0.6% each. Or nine tweaks averaging +0.7% and one error of -0.3%. IÂm not a mathematician but wouldnÂt be surprised to learn that gives at least factorial 10 divided by factorial 2 + factorial 10 divided by factorial 3 etc etc - permutations of tweaks. This is a big number and makes it pointless trying to eliminate rogue tweaks.
I hope this makes some sense. ItÂs a lengthy process typing one handed in the foetal position  especially when you canÂt see your watch.
IÂve looked up Solingen, thank you, but what I need are very fine clippers not scissors  ideally ones that float.