Building high-end 'tables cheap at Home Despot II

Jean,
Ever since I sent you an e-mail a couple of years ago that mentioned the use of direct coupling in my DIY project, you just keep using the phrase. Is that a soundbite, or what? The idea is old as the hills, and gunmakers have used it in reference to stock bedding for an eternity, yet you lay claim to it by beating the words into the ground. Most every turntable out there is direct coupled. The Rek-O-Kut is by default, so it isn't some recent discovery among turntable manufacturers, either. Why don't you consider giving it a rest?
Regards,

Hi Jean,

You’re quite the lightning rod, wherever in the world you are. To echo Grant’s sentiment – enjoy your travels and come back safe. Your point of where audio fits into life’s scheme is well taken. The welcoming smile from an unprestigious tolltaker is always to be valued more than the grudging nod from a titan of industry. Reviewed or not, we all know what we’ve got in the Lenco and its ability to bring smiles to the unpretentious.

While this thread teeters between becoming moribund and generating more heat than light, you’ll be happy to know that the groundswell of Lenco and Idler building continues outside borders of AudiogoN. Not only in the dedicated magnet realms that you mentioned, but also in that huge proletariat site we spoke of last year. The idler trickle-down is happening!

Funny, I’ve been through “Da” original “Thread” twice now, and I could find no place where you claimed to be the originator or inventor of any scientific principles as applied to the Lenco build. Certainly, there was a justifiable pride in application and development, but how that transforms in other minds as self-promotion is a mystery to me. More to point, it was a generous sharing of your time, effort and knowledge – a gift to individuals and to “the cause”.

“I have tremendous respect for these great pieces of audio history. They still can make a lot of modern and exspensive belt drives sound absolutely broken! No question. And when on a budget, the Lenco is THE king of the hill.”
- Steve - aka Vetterone

In reviewing the header post on what got this all started – I'd take this as a concession that you delivered the goods as promised.

Enjoy, and hope to see you when you get back.

- Mario

"Funny, I’ve been through “Da” original “Thread” twice now, and I could find no place where you claimed to be the originator or inventor of any scientific principles as applied to the Lenco build. Certainly, there was a justifiable pride in application and development, but how that transforms in other minds as self-promotion is a mystery to me."
Mario B.

"When I started the original thread, I wanted the design as simple as it could be in order to gather fellow experimenters, and in the process discovered myself that it was not necessary to remove the motor. In fact, I discovered mass and Direct Coupling (the two go together) make a FAR larger difference to the sound, and make such acrobatics as split plinths moot (as the annihilation of the low-mass two-tier Cain & Cain plinth by my single high-mass plinth makes clear). In addition, the least difference in the geometry of the motor relative to the workings will be detrimental to the sound. Nevertheless, until I started the original thread, I had listened to my two-tier Lenco for close on 12 years. Of course, everyone is free to design as they wish, it's your baby, and the Lenco will not disappoint, as its essential ingredients will remain, all tied to its amazing speed stability (which, however, improves by Direct Coupling to a high mass)."
J. Nantais

The above is not from the original thread, but this thread. The timeline for construction techniques was changed, so that the originator of those techniques would appear to be Nantais. Those were not his discoveries, yet he lays claim to any technique posted by others.

Hi Mosin,

It would seem that there is little to be gained by splitting semantic hairs over the meaning of “discovered” – especially since you seem to be carrying some pain and anger over this for quite some time. Had Jean written “I discovered what others had suggested to be a vast improvement” or more simply, “I discovered for myself” would he have been off the hook? But in the end, he did not write those words and you took it as slight and a “grab”.

But the word “discovered” will always be tinged with chauvinism, whether one says that Newton discovered gravity, or Columbus discovered America, or I discovered that I was too short of funds to buy my wife flowers the other day. Who discovered “direct coupling” and why does that matter?

Somehow I don’t come away from reading Jean’s posts with a sense that there’s something sinister or duplicitous going on with him. Truth be told, Mosin, in the wake of you and others showing up here – after a long absence – not to post anything positive – but to attack – that strikes me as sinister.

Civility is certainly nice when you can get it, but as I cautioned Jean many moons ago placing expectations on how others act can be a losing proposition. By the same token, expecting acknowledgement or desserts over perceived intellectual property is also a losing proposition. This is a public forum on the World-Wide-Web. What’s out is out.
If you’ve got something to share, do so with no strings attached. Otherwise, you’d do well to keep it to yourself.

All best,
Mario

Mario,

Thanks, I do have something to share. :)

http://www.audioasylum.com/audio/vinyl/messages/67/674532.html

Regards,